I think we are close, but we have yet to reach peak hypocrisy detection. We could have a wiki of hypocrisy, where you can search for a certain person and find out all the times they contradicted themselves, possibly with justifications. (Maybe evidence changed their minds and they stand corrected.) We could have an hypocrisy rating weighted by influence on the matter. For example:
Mr. John Smith has contradicted himself x% of the time in matters where he has a strong influence and provided a justification backed by evidence for only y%. On z% of the topics he has contradicted himself, he has offer a threshold of evidence required to change his mind again. He has violated j% of those thresholds. All this gives him an overall coherency rating of k% which puts him in the nth in the ranking of his colleagues.
Mr. John Smith has contradicted himself x% of the time in matters where he has a strong influence and provided a justification backed by evidence for only y%. On z% of the topics he has contradicted himself, he has offer a threshold of evidence required to change his mind again. He has violated j% of those thresholds. All this gives him an overall coherency rating of k% which puts him in the nth in the ranking of his colleagues.
That would be peak hypocrisy.