Artificial general intelligence certainly exists --that just means a learning model that doesn't have specific rules for any domain--, it just isn't very good in every area yet.
Yep, this is what I meant by my (now downvoted) post.
The foundation exists, what is/has been promised does not yet exist. If this group actually had an AGI, we'd be having an entirely different conversation (about the societal ramifications, mostly likely).
If AGI exists, it isn't on par with human level yet. No AI has reached the human level of intelligence yet. I think that is the argument that was made on it.
Many people define AGI as human level intelligence, and we're supposed to get there by 2020 or 2030 or so on when computers reach faster speeds.
Lying on the front page doesn't seem very promising, especially for someone you're giving your money to.