Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

To represent the case for dynamic languages as "the speed at which you can physically type code" is a straw man.



I agree, I think there are many more issues to consider. However, the OP seemed to be focusing on that particular argument, hence my comment. A few examples:

"The results were that the people using the dynamic version of the language got stuff done much quicker"

"it took less time to find those errors [in the statically typed language] than it did to write the type safe code in the first place [in the dynamically typed language]."

"[programs written in]" dynamic languages took significantly less effort to create (less time)"




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: