I agree with that is more or less what it is, but I'm not sure if I have a problem with it since it delivers the features people expect from a desktop OS. If you stop and think about the UNIX model, it really does not deliver everything that a desktop OS needs.
At the same time, there is plenty of room for traditional sysv or bsd style Linux distributions, particularly in the cloud/container space. It boggles the mind that Ubuntu is the most popular distribution in that area, considering how many of its features are utterly unused and unnecessary on a container.
And yet it's not an official announcement, hasn't been discussed on any systemd related mailing lists, has no documentation and merely exists as a git repository.
It's almost as if the programmers were experimenting with ideas that are alternatives to kdbus.
That's ok. I was too sarcastic in that reply, sorry if I caused offence (I strive to modify my tendencies towards catty comments, but I'm a work in progress - When I see I've done it I'm making it a policy to acknowledge it and apologise).
Could I ask a genuine question? Aside from systemd, why do you distrust freedesktop?
