I get your point. The notion of designating a broken implementation as "the standard" makes me queasy, ever since IE6 happened.
But still, I would have much preferred if the GP would have started their comment with "yes, but" instead of "sorry, no". That would have made the distinction much clearer.
But still, I would have much preferred if the GP would have started their comment with "yes, but" instead of "sorry, no". That would have made the distinction much clearer.