On: If it's not practical to redistribute, it's not free software in practice

[mjg59]

All you need to handle that is a trademark. You don't need to impose restrictions on binaries other than those that trademark law already imposes.

[empyrical → mjg59]

Yeah, and if you try to add restrictions to the software license itself you'll also end up with GPL incompatible code

[mjg59 → empyrical]

Large parts of Ubuntu aren't under the GPL, and as a result Canonical can impose additional restrictions.