On: Python 3 makes it easier to develop high-quality s...

[sanderjd]

The summary of the argument may be vague, but that's ok, it's the summary; the specifics are why there's an accompanying article.

[angelbob → sanderjd]

Sure. But that's still a lousy title. "Python 3 is better than Python 2", for instance, while true, is completely failing to explain why the article is interesting.

[CydeWeys → angelbob]

I'm not defending the title, and I don't think lots of discussion over said title is really that useful. I found the contents of the article interesting.