They have no right to deny you access to their platform or to deny content from being distributed through their platform. Something about that sounds incorrect.
Well, a black man not being a slave wasn't his right in 1840 Georgia either. Staying in the same hotel as whites wasn't his right in 1950.
It's always better to concentrate at what we think SHOULD be the right or what it's we consider ethical, than merely restating what happens to be the law, which can very easily be BS.
And "whether we like it or not" plays a huge role in having laws changed -- that's where we should be starting from, not waving it away as if we're some kind of non-citizen slaves where things are just forced upon us.
They're not granting me access, they're restricting my access to content they don't own. They have no real right to deny me access.