Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> It lasted between 1-2 hours on a full charge

That sounds like a huge exaggeration or a broken phone. What model was it? There is no way a phone like this would be sold.



> That sounds like a huge exaggeration or a broken phone.

Neither. The phone was an HTC Evo 4G:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Evo_4G

Link describing the horrible battery life:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/17/technology/personaltech/17...

I had the phone fully charged, used it to navigate by car from SF to a place in Mountain View, checked email a few times from Mountain View, and the phone was completely dead for the ride back.

If a single person at HTC or Google had tried to use this phone for any kind of normal utilization, I think it's quite likely it would not have been launched.

If I'd purchased the phone instead of getting it as a giveaway, I would surely have been irate. As it was, I sold it to someone via CraigsList for a few hundred bucks.

This is why I predict Apple will continue to dominate. Android and the Android ecosystem still have many of these same kind of lapses and warts. My Nexus 7 is very greedy on battery and does not go into any kind of hibernation, which means that if I forget to charge it, it's dead after two days with no use at all.


I see, still seems like something was way off with the specific mode. It also mentions that an update increased the battery life - although not by how much.


> something was way off with the specific model

It seems odd that nobody would have done real world testing of the device.

> an update increased the battery life

Perhaps, though since it was not a google phone, it was likely at least a year until any software updates were available.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: