The basic argument is that the explosion in prison population is driven mostly by changing attitudes/behavior of the prosecuting DA's in the past few decades. They have simply chosen to go after felony charges more frequently than in the past. This is problematic because they are elected and there is no federal-level fix that can be applied.
Brit here. How often, and for how many posts do you typically vote in elections in the US? It seems like everyone down to the local Librarian is an elected official. Are these votes held one at a time, or is there one massive election for a couple of dozen posts all at the same time every year or something? What's the typical turnout for these elections? How is it decided which posts will be elected and which ones are appointments, and does this vary from place to place?
In comparison, we generally have two elections every 5 years. One for our MP in Westminster, and one for our local council and these are often held simultaneously. For many people, that's it. Some cities also have Mayoral elections, and there can be town or parish council elections as well but whether these exist or not is very local. I don't think we have any direct elections to administrative positions, unless you count Mayors. There might be some rare local exceptions to that but they're most likely purely ceremonial.
The elections are typically bundled, so in a particular November in some places you might be voting for president, senator, representative, governor (most states have gubernatorial elections halfway through presidential terms, though), state representative, state senator, district attorney, sheriff, school board, propositions (binding referenda on legislation or amendments to state constitutions), ... Turnout varies a lot, with much higher turnouts in presidential elections (but these additional voters may or may not vote on the other ballots).
In the federal govt AIUI there are no elections for executive offices other than the presidency, so only president, vice-president, senators and representatives are elected. But many state and local executives are elected, as determined by local legislation.
The "police and crime commissioner" scheme was an attempt to replicate the US model of policing in the UK. However, since they don't have the power to direct prosecutions or any real budget, it's a completely useless £100k-year post that gets 5-15% turnout in elections.
Mandatory minimums should be removed entirely, as no law can cover all circumstances. There will always be cases where the mandatory minimum is unjust.
It would be terrible if photogenic, attractive and likeable people went to jail for the same amount of time as an ugly asshole who isn't part of our tribe. If that happened, we'd have a relatable human face going to jail.
I hope someone can come up with a rational argument against what blfr said. The fact that you have little more than emotional condemnation suggests he might have a good point.
How about that it is the opposite of what we consider fair and equal justice? Justice should be blind to how attractive and wealthy you are. Jailing a rich millionaire is a greater loss of utility then a homeless man. If you think that is an argument for playing favourites then you do not grasp the concept of justice.
The basic argument is that the explosion in prison population is driven mostly by changing attitudes/behavior of the prosecuting DA's in the past few decades. They have simply chosen to go after felony charges more frequently than in the past. This is problematic because they are elected and there is no federal-level fix that can be applied.