Huh, what? The commenter is asking why one industry is open to regulator scrutiny and the other isn't.
My reply covers why lobbyists from one industry might have incentives for not being open to scrutiny, while lobbyists from the other industry might not.
I'm not answering literally the question "why is it acceptable..." because that's not the real issue at play here.
My reply covers why lobbyists from one industry might have incentives for not being open to scrutiny, while lobbyists from the other industry might not.
I'm not answering literally the question "why is it acceptable..." because that's not the real issue at play here.