That sort of gets at my point, stash makes sense in a corner of a high disciplined workflow. But the article presents it as approaching "best practice" and as a belt to sport with one's lederhosen. By analogy it's a bit like multiple inheritance in C++, on occasion and for some people it might be just the thing, but it's probably not a good starting assumption at the design phase.
Though again, it's a minor criticism and mostly related to the impression of importance positioning it at the end of the article suggests [i.e. placing the strongest point in paragraph four of the five paragraph essay].
Though again, it's a minor criticism and mostly related to the impression of importance positioning it at the end of the article suggests [i.e. placing the strongest point in paragraph four of the five paragraph essay].