Calling it a party store is common in the suburbs of Detroit. In the city itself it is almost unanimously just called a liquor store. If it sells gas then you just call it a gas station.
This seems to me like a very High School English teacher inspired interpretation of the story. I'm not sure what your distinction is between opinion and thesis, but in either case the "sins of the father" quote is just a dramatic element of the story. The thesis IMO is quite clearly a critique on the hypocrisies of the Norwegian society at the time. The characters in the book that all proclaim traditional values and virtues are all hiding despicable behavior while the mother and son subscribe to a more progressive morality and are punished for it.
Also Carver might feel more vital and reel considering his stories are about people in my parents or grandparents generation (people I've met), whereas Ibsen was writing when Victorian England was still a thing. I love both authors btw.
Thanks for that. I really did want readers of my comment to look him up. There’s a reason Chomsky describes his work as being without value, but now we’ve just got two appeals to authority going. I’d rather people look up some Zizek on YouTube and judge for themselves.
In a way, Zizek and his forebears represent the problem with the modern left: they left reality behind in favour of nonsensical “theory” that intimidates most people because it sounds authoritative, despite being empty.
For balance, I’m entirely certain that you could make similar claims of being out of touch with reality of the right, but they do not, for example, try to couch their ideas in an impenetrable fog of deconstructivism and psychoanalysis.
I wonder to what degree that relates to our subjective submersion for so long into the collective percolated ideas of Hume and Hobbes and Kant and Locke and (with the extent latter-day capitalism has adopted some variant of 'the end of history) Hegel. That is to say, were any of these works being actively purveyed to the public now, rather that forming a sort constituent background radiation in which even the prenatal are bathed, whether the foundation works of what is called western-enlightenment wouldn't be viewed in the same light. (In fact, I would wager one could start publicly reading from any of the above mentioned [excepting Hegel, for obvious reasons] and be sure of getting at least a few denouncements along the lines of 'postmodern trash'.
Also, I'm tempted to say that idea or only penetrable when they're not considered at all, that is, when they are merely that constituent background radiation of our lives. (Much like how we tend to know the answer to something right up until we're asked the question.) And upon the act of engagement, that is trying to understand any of this, we're left with Adam Smith being as seemingly impenetrable as Freud.
I didn't know that, so I stand corrected. But I wonder if there are any serious (published) responses calling his positions nonsensical or even incoherent rather than merely disagreeing.
There are many, many institutions preforming global IPv4 scans daily and many tools that allow you to do it[0][1][2]. The trick is to "Be a good citizen", work with a scan friendly host, signal your benevolence, and limit the rate at which you scan. Also smart to black-list DoD networks. If you don't believe me setup a honey pot and open up a popular udp amplification port. Haven't done so myself but I would expect many instances of scanning would be seen everyday.
