> but you will need to first create a public IP resource, named myPublicIp, and a new virtual network called myVnet with address space 11.0.0.0/8, and a subnet with address space 11.1.0.0/16 called mySubnet
Lombok is a compile time library that doesn’t do any magic but replacing an annotation with fragments of code. It feels more like using macros which exist in many languages. And it helps in keeping the code readable and DRY.
So the code is inflated because the machine does the code repetition for you. The structure of your program is not getting better I think. I do not argue against annotations but in this case, if there is such a simple thing as try with resources, just use it. If your code is sprinkled over with annotations like this it is hardly getting more understandable. From my experience, a single annotation comes often in packs.
I'd like to highlight the following from the linked chat conversation:
> kovshenin: it's all about how you treat translation files. if you're blindly merging pull requests with compiled .mo files for your plugin, you're going to end up with <script> somewhere in there sooner or later
No there is a firmware hack called emokit which allows data with the $300 headset (correction its $400 now LMAO). However, emotiv is by far the single worst company I ever dealt with. Worst product support experience of my life. Having bought one of those epoc headsets I have to say its the very definition of flimsy, a half baked buggy product with planned obsolescence and proprietary restriction built in on every level of design. Emotiv even censored their forum and deleted my username to hide how they totally fucked me over. I support the openbci guys they have done a great thing by making a open source EEG sensor kit but well they are being rather greedy in the marketing. A terrible idea because right now they need to build a developer community around the device. They should be giving these kits away.
If you plan to use Emokit, please drop me a line (email's in my profile) if you have any issues. I'm no longer the maintainer, but I like to keep abreast of its usage, and want to make sure that it continues working for new devices. (For context, I'm the original reverse-engineer behind Emokit.)
Looks active to me: the repo owner actively participates in bugs/PR opened days or hours ago.
As for the article, I started it in May, forgot about it, then released it today. Hence the May 2014 date.
Am I mistaken or this is very wrong?