Emotions have a purpose - disgust to keep us away, love to keep us together, lust to procreate, fear to chase us from danger. Without a purpose for an emotion, it's hard to see why these would happen. And maybe their emotions would be baffling to us because their world is so alien.
On-die CPU caches typically use SRAM. Modern DRAM chips are already die-stacked in several layers. But maybe DRAM is more heat sensitive than SRAM, so more difficult to stack atop a stronger heat source?
The recent rise in mercantilism / trade wars / tariffs / America (or insert country) First / China one child policies / China and Soviet state official atheism / Russia and China banning gays
It is questionable if it's universally innate, there being many atheists, but now you've explained it I can see your point.
Have to say you used some ill-focussed or ill-expressed arguments which is why I have been repeatedly chasing you for an explanation. Take that as you will. But thanks for clarifying.
I'm not an expert but I'm pretty sure there were wide exchanges of peoples happened thousands of years earlier (eg. stonehenge burials came from a wide range of europe - this from memory).
I personally don't like what that drug does to my blood pressure. I have had better luck with 2c-b but the best positive long term effects from magic truffles (a specific version of magic mushrooms sold fresh in Amsterdam). They were all fun but only the magic truffles had this long come down period of laser focused introspection that drove meaningful and positive long term changes in my life and lifestyle.
So long as you don't store things in such a way that you can't tell derived and stale data from new, the idea works exactly the same?
I fully grant that immutable structures take away the concerns over data being coherent together. Such that it's easy to do without worrying about someone changing the data under you.
Oddly, it can sometimes make it even harder to know that data is stale. Since updating a small part can devolve into a chore. Still fully agreed that that is the best default position.
RPN is forth not lisp, and I seriously doubt HP got their idea from emacs. I think HP's RPN precedes the first release of emacs anyway. Edit: 1st release of emacs was 1976 so I take that last bit back.
Sorry, I mistyped. I was thinking about HP42 and above RPL not the basic RPN. RPL is a blend of lisp idiom on top of good old stack based RPN (list, map, numerical tower). It goes so far that they even added quoted lambda expressions. You could push << a -> + a a >> on your stack.