Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | xexers's comments login

[Deleted]


We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17864539 and marked it off-topic.


Here is a prominent Japanese American, George Takei, who was interned in the 40s, drawing from his experience to complain about contemporary US policy on behalf of other groups.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/06/19/at-least-during-the-int...

So maybe the lesson to be learned is not the one you think?


They have complained and have even asked for reparations.


They have also been granted reparations of about $160 million.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Liberties_Act_of_1988


The surviving Japanese Americans actually received reparations for the internment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Liberties_Act_of_1988


Do you realize what you're saying here? "We abused that guy for years and he never complained or demanded better. Why can't we all be more like that?"


This is the whole mindset of people who want to maintain the status quo. "Just keep your mouth shut" is a mantra that only helps to maintain the oppression system.


Is the oppression system the bit that keeps the lights on? The alternative tends to be the system where everyone starves.


You seriously think those are the only two options?


I didn't read the comment that way. I read it as life sucks for a lot of people at times. Some dwell on it and never get past it. Others find a way to move forward, to make their own lives better instead of demanding that someone else do it.


That may be a good prescription for dealing with tragedies personally, but if everyone did that then those doing the abusing would never suffer any consequences, and society would never change.


Lesson: cease interning people and they won’t complain about being interned?


> "Have a high "pass" rate. If 90+% of candidates aren't progressing past the homework, you might have an abuse problem. In an abuse problem, companies are giving homework to candidates who are unlikely to make it. Figure out why you're giving too many poor fits homework, or figure out why good fits aren't doing well."

That sounds crazy to me. Both from an employer and employee standpoint... If that's the case, it's a waste of time. Why have a test that almost everyone passes?

I've given homework like this before and our pass rate was about 40%.


> Boredom is a fact of life, and learning to accept it without forcing yourself to depend on a smartphone is an underrated skill.

There is a whole book on that topic:

www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06VTZYPTF


So why not use a dumb phone as a cell; They're cheaper too!


I agree. There are lots of tangent careers you can do with a CS degree. Also consider: IT operations, Quality Assurance, technical PM, network infrastructure. Some of these might require a bit more training, but your CS degree is a solid foundation to build from.


> If you aren't actually creating content [art, software, serious writing, etc] then using a mobile is fine

I've seen some serious art been made using ipads and even mobile phones alone. Hang out with creative teenagers and you'll see it too. There are entire video editing suites on ipad that can create slick videos entirely with touch gestures.

https://www.imore.com/why-i-love-editing-video-ipad-it-can-s...


The iPad is a fabulous music-making tool. A lot of people with fully equipped recording studios prefer to use the iPad when they're sketching out ideas, because they find it easier to stay in a creative mindset. Several artists have recorded and mixed albums entirely on the iPad.

The BBC now routinely use iPhones for TV and radio newsgathering; they have developed an in-house app for capturing content and directly ingesting it to their media asset system. Many radio stations use the LUCI Live app for remote contributors.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/academy/journalism/article/art201604201...

http://www.luci.eu/products/luci-live/


The BBC now routinely use iPhones for TV and radio newsgathering

They also routinely report "someone said something on Twitter" as if it was actual news. It doesn't mean it's a good idea.


> it's a Very Bad Thing

It's happened probably 10s of thousands of times in the past few decades... and some of those couples are now happily married. I personally know of a boss who married his secretary and a professor who married a student.

I think the words "Very Bad Thing" are a little excessive. It's risky behavior.


See Bill and Melinda Gates, for one example.



I hired the woman who would become my wife.


Clearly you should both be fired.


10s of thousands? Think hundreds of thousands...


Damn near every bank in Canada uses cobol on zOS and DB2. I'd suggest searching job postings at all major banks. Likely you'd need to move to Toronto though because that's where the bank HQs are. Also check out a company called CGI... they have a few Cobol/mainframe positions open right now:

https://cgi.njoyn.com/CGI/xweb/xweb.asp?page=joblisting&CLID...

Also, check out the Cobol cowboys:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-banks-cobol-idUSKBN17...


I don't understand. Sharing a house with a stable partner is cheaper than not. Right?


Ok, but say you are parent and want what's best for your future kid. It's better for your child that you be #34 partner of Bill Gates, than #1 partner of Joe Jobless. Now apply that realization to everyone.

Soon, only the wealthiest will be able to find partners.

One way would be to raise kids in commune, but even then a super rich commune will beat any other. They would have access to best medical care, the best trainers, the best pretty much everything.


Anyone with any self-worth is not going to want to be partner #34 of anyone. They're not going to get any time with that person. Someone who's just a gold-digger might be fine with that, but that's it.

The whole idea of polyamory is that you can have deep, committed relationships with multiple people, but since your time is limited, you can only practically have 2, maybe 3 partners like this.


ok, but now you are talking about kids. Your original comment was simply talking about partners.


The logic is pretty much the same. Just replace kids with selfish interest. It's still qualitatively better to be Warren Buffet's partner #42 than Joe Shmoe's #1.


Scott Adams does this too. He goes to the gym everyday and laces up his shoes. Once that's done, it's considered a "successful day at the gym". Of course 99% of the time he stays for a workout... but yeah, the odd time he just goes home after lacing up his shoes.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: