Introducing a novel system called Provenance Marks for marking and verifying the provenance of creative or intellectual works, digital or physical. This system combines cryptography, pseudorandom number generation, and linguistic representation to produce a unique digital mark for each piece of work. Each mark, which can be represented as a sequence of natural language words, contains elements to verify the previous mark and commit to the content of the next one, forming a cryptographically-secured chain. This user-friendly method not only enhances security but also offers a simple solution for artists, institutions, and even larger commercial fields to protect their works against fraudulent claims and deep fakes.
Thanks for the link— hadn't heard of Smoothlife. Very cool. Of course the same technique could be adapted in some form.
One advantage of LifeHash using a small world-size is that the pattern inevitably becomes stable (repeats a state) after a reasonable number of iterations. I do have a hard-coded limit for the number of iterations, but it's just a backstop and large enough so I never see it hit in practice. A much larger, more complex simulation could go on for much longer, and since I really want to end up with a static icon, I want to limit the time and complexity of computing it.
Another advantage of using a small world size is that the initial 16x16 cell grid includes exactly 256 cells, which is the same number of bits in a SHA256 hash. Any hash, visual or otherwise, should be extremely sensitive to initial conditions, so a small change in input yields a massive change in output. Having the same number of cells as hash bits means every single bit counts with equal significance to the outcome.
A method of hash visualization based on Conway’s Game of Life that creates beautiful icons that are deterministic, yet distinct and unique given the input data.
The basic concept is to take a SHA256 hash of the input data (which can be any data including another hash) and then use the 256-bit digest as a 16x16 pixel "seed" for running the cellular automata known as Conway’s Game of Life.
After the pattern becomes stable (or begins repeating) the resulting history is used to compile a grayscale image of all the states from the first to last generation. Using Game of Life provides visual structure to the resulting image, even though it was seeded with entropy.
Some bits of the initial hash are then used to deterministically apply symmetry and color to the icon to add beauty and quick recognizability.
I stopped reading the article at this point, as this statement didn't merely undermine the the author's credibility, it actually collapsed their credibility into a gaping sinkhole.
Int is a 64-bit data type and Int32 is 32-bits. The compiler refuses to infer that you want to lose data. Converting the other way, the compiler refuses to infer that you want to bloat your data.
CGFloat, depending on the runtime, may either be a Float or a Double, so explicitly converting to and from it is required.
Rather than create a byzantine set of rules about whether it is "safe" to convert from one type to another, Swift wisely requires that all type conversions be explicit.
