Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | velorek's commentslogin

I didn't know this feature was available on windows,you are right it looks quite similar, today I learned hehe thanks


Yea, I think I can add colour change easily. Stay tuned! :)


I surely will :]


Cool! This other project of mine (1) is a more finished product and might be better for testing. It's a terminal periodic table with the same display principles as C-edit but should be less buggy. (1) https://github.com/velorek1/terminalperiodictable


I wasn't able to compile edge for some reason but it looks cool :). I'll try to do it again when I have some free time. Thank you for sharing your insights. I totally understand what you say about the dedication part, especially when it comes to projects becoming bigger and bigger through the years. It's hard to keep focused and not get overwhelmed at some point


I didn't know about this resource. Thank you for sharing. I had only seen this one https://viewsourcecode.org/snaptoken/kilo/ I did notice that all editors modeled after this tutorial tended to be clones. That's why I opted for a trial-and-error approach as a learning experience.


See also: EMACS: The Extensible, Customizable Display Editor <https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs-paper.html> from 1981, by Richard Stallman – the main author of Emacs – as a more Emacs-specific resource.

Or Theory and practice of text editors, or, A cookbook for an Emacs, the original thesis written by Craig A. Finseth in 1980 before he wrote the book I originally linked to: <https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15905>


vim FTW! :D


Interesting. Cool library, I'll check it out. :) Thanks for sharing


I agree. Unicode support is top priority. Thank you for sharing those links.


Thank you, I appreciate it :)


Glad it compiled! Most of your suggestions are on my to-do list indeed. I wanted to maintain an animation to demonstrate that it could be kept running throughout all the different dialogs and listboxes. I'll probably end up changing it. Thank you for testing it. :)


I have to say that when I saw retro I expected ncurses support. Not all retro terminals understand VT100 escape sequences ;-)

What about those who use VT-52 terminals?


Unless you’re using an actual hardware VT52, then it’s pretty safe to assume VT100 support these days.


I concede most physical terminals still alive will have some form of VT100 emulation (up to VT500-level, usually), but half the fun is to make something that can actually run on ancient hardware.


Yeah i know what you mean. I sometimes get that impulse too.


We have 50 years or so of Unix history to honour. We shouldn’t do any less than that.


Makes good sense. Keep up the good work!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: