unnali's comments

On: Google Is Forbidding Users From Reselling, Loaning Glass Eyewear

[unnali]

If you read the terms, in the non-Device Specific Addendum:

> You may not commercially resell any Device, but you may give the Device as a gift, unless otherwise set forth in the Device Specific Addendum.

So, nope.

[ok_craig → unnali]

> May not commercially resell

Sounds like you can still give / gift / sell / otherwise transfer a glass unit to another individual privately. This all sounds completely normal.

[GHFigs → ok_craig]

The addendum for the Explorer Edition states: you may not resell, loan, transfer, or give your Device to any other person.

That's what the story is about, because there are no other editions of Glass.

[ok_craig → GHFigs]

I don't understand this reply. I was replying to the comment, not the story directly. The comment is referring to future editions.

[uncoder0 → unnali]

Huh, oops... I wonder how 'commercially resell' is defined in this context. Can it be resold for non commercial purposes? Such as a private resale?

I found the same terminology in the Google Fiber ToS with respect to the Chromebook that comes with the service.

http://fiber.google.com/legal/chromebook.html

On: Linode hacked, CCs and passwords leaked

[unnali]

Well, yes: try some of those files out:

http://linode.com/MyAddress.class http://linode.com/y_key_57284cb2de704e02.html http://linode.com/ispcheck http://linode.com/k5_3

etc.

On: When a No means Yes

[unnali]

I clicked on the comments just to see if anyone noticed this shit; thank goodness you did.

[brennenHN → unnali]

I did the same thing and no one had yet

On: It is ridiculously easy to refactor Go

[unnali]

> There's no runtime type checking with Go's interface system.

Except when there is: http://golang.org/ref/spec#Type_assertions