The tortoise lays on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun, beating its legs trying to turn itself over, but it can't. Not without your help. But you're not helping.
Tesla produce a lot of for the EU in China. They have a schedule where for each quarter, months 1, 2 and 3, in Month 1, they produce cars. In Month 2 they sail them over from China. And in Month 3, they arrive and are sold.
BMW managed to overtake Tesla in the first month of Q3, barely. When Tesla really had no cars for sale.
How would this be different if they all were physically in the same office? Would you stop by their office and tell them to do what you prefer them to be doing? If so, is it not possible to tell them remotely over a Zoom call?
True, I have been managing team remotely. Its entirely depend on the developer. Some developers doesnt work in the remote. The remote is entirely trust based.
My team was entirely remote who was performing better then the team which was entirely working from office.
I agree there's somewhat more trust involved, e.g. you don't know if they go to the park for the day and just check notifications on their phone, but you still have all the performance metrics to look at. If the person is doing all their work then it might be better to let them take that day at the park when they feel like it, especially if it's a salary position then you're more expected to do a certain amount of work then to be working a certain amount of hours.
Worst case you can always ask someone "hey can you show me what you did last week?" and it should be clear if someone isn't handling their responsibilities.
That is false. They make operating systems and development tools for embedded applications such as aerospace and automotive. Some automotive companies may use the tools to make advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) or automated driving systems (ADS), but that is as much a competitor with Tesla as GM's hammer supplier is a competitor with Tesla.
> They make operating systems and development tools for embedded applications such as aerospace [...]
Specifically a "Platform for Safe and Secure Automated Driving Systems". Could argue it's still not a FSD competitor in its own right, but it's more than just the implied "they make developement tools, which happen to be used by some automotive companies, which happen to make ADAS".
We are all trained on copyrighted input. That is not a problem. What is a problem is if you reproduce it and try to claim copyright for that. If someone wants to create their own image of Mario in an AI, so what?
We are not machines. The argument that procedural text and image generators are similar to us is ridiculous. The issue is not whether people can generate images. The issue is ai companies stealing content and reselling it. That needs to stop.
> The argument that procedural text and image generators are similar to us is ridiculous.
Agreed. The amount of endless whataboutisms AI proponents have to continuously invent around comparing humans and AI machines as having 'similar' characteristics to justify mass copyright violation is just absolutely laughable.
> The issue is ai companies stealing content and reselling it.
The key point here is the 'reselling' part, without credit, attribution or permission to do so and then claiming the creation as one's own. The fact that these AI companies won't disclose their training data, tells us that they know they are in deep trouble. The so-called 'fair use' excuses isn't going to work this time.
Given that Apple paid news orgs to train on their licensed data, the lawsuit with the NYT should not be a surprise for OpenAI and Microsoft (as they knew that they needed to pay for a license to access and train on the data) and will eventually end with a licensing deal with the NYT.
Dig1t 17 minutes ago | root | parent | prev | next [–]
The ADL also defines racism as something that only white people are capable of.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/04/us/anti-defamation-league-rac...
They changed the definition in 2022 from: "Racism is the belief that a particular race is superior or inferior to another, that a person’s social and moral traits are predetermined by his or her inborn biological characteristics. Racial separatism is the belief, most of the time based on racism, that different races should remain segregated and apart from one another."
to "The marginalization and/or oppression of people of color based on a socially constructed racial hierarchy that privileges white people."
The article says the exact opposite of your/dig1t's comment. The definition you're saying they changed to is actually the OLD definition that the leadership in 2022 moved away from because it was ridiculously narrow.
Just curious, did you actually RTFA that you're misquoting?
reply