The point is that the site, contacting your local MEP, and all the discussion in this thread, is pointless to affect some kind of durable societal change
Pointing out that it's vibe-coded just emphasises that all of the above actions are just low-effort cope
>On 11 May 2022 the European Commission presented a proposal which would make chat control searching mandatory for all e-mail and messenger providers and would even apply to so far securely end-to-end encrypted communication services
And scanning end-to-end encrypted is only possible on-device.
And of course the next step is that the EU will mandate that every device needs to implement this scanning, they are very aggressive with this stuff. Framework phone won't help you in this case, this is obviously the next step. That's why we have to fight against it. Reminder that soon online age verification with an app that can only be downloaded from the Play Store and used within a "trusted environment" (e.g. SafetyNet) will be mandatory.
Some people are annoyed at the hype, some are making good faith arguments about the pros/cons, and some people are just cranky. AI is a popular subject and we've all got our hot takes.
Has a critical service that you used meaningfully changed to seemingly integrate non-deterministic "intelligence" in the past 3 years in one of its critical paths? I'd bet good money that the answer to literally everyone is no.
My company uses GenAI a lot in a lot of projects. Would it have some impact if all models suddenly stopped working? Sure. But the oncalls wouldn't even get paged.
> If the AI actually outperforms humans in the full context of the work, then no, we won't. It will be so much cheaper and faster that businesses won't have to argue at all. Those that adopt them will massively outcompetes those that don't.
This. The dev's outcompeting by using AI today are too busy shipping, rather than wasting time writing blog posts about what ultimately, is a skill-issue.
> “It takes me at least the same amount of time to review code not written by me than it would take me to write the code myself, if not more.”
There’s your issue, the skill of programming has changed.
Typing gets fast; so does review once robust tests already prove X, Y, Z correctness properties.
With the invariants green, you get faster at grokking the diff, feed style nits back into the system prompt, and keep tuning the infinite tap to your taste.
Does anyone else find that ELO skill built on screens does not carry over to over-the-board chess as much? It seems curious how physicality seems to materially affect a game which is meant to be primarily mental.
Elo is dependent upon the player pool. Claude Bloodegood [1] took this to an extreme, nearly becoming the highest rated player in the world at the time, largely by playing officially rated games in prison against other players who were completely inexperienced but whose rating did not reflect that since they were, in turn, also only playing against completely inexperienced players.
Online ratings have a correlation with otb ratings, but they're very different - especially on the lower (and extremely high) ends.
reply