Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | twilightzone's comments login

I don't know, but I really hope it's not that.


Even works in reader mode.


Lovely story.


fixed, they must've called simonw.


Yes, the bias created by being informed is exactly the point of the study.


Google search is dead.


Nah. If you actually try this, you'll see it's not that good.


I thought Google's given Bard access to the internet?? I guess people still don't think to use Bard over ChatGPT


Even the Bard UI is worse. Being able to read the ChatGPT output as it's generated, instead of staring at a blank screen, is a massive time saver. And, I prefer ChatGPT trying stuff rather than Bard telling me that 'it can't do that right now' and 'we're trying to get better'. I've tried Bard, it's just not worth it.


> Being able to read the ChatGPT output as it's generated, instead of staring at a blank screen, is a massive time saver.

There's an option in Bard's settings to enable real time replies.


My experience is different. I think Bard is giving better answers than chatgpt so I really use it daily even more than google search.


Better than the free or the paid chatgpt?


I use everything to create newsletter/podcast content and Bard is consistently the best for me. Then Claude and Bing, and ChatGPT last. By a mile. I have ChatGPTPlus, with chat access to GPT4 but not API access to GPT4.

Just got access to Bard API and hoping that continues delivering what I have been happy with...


Unfortunately for Google, Bard is irrelevant by means of being late and inferior to GPT-4


Bing has had GPT-4 + internet search forever. It hasn't killed Google yet.


Yes but it leaves conversations when it wants to. Also one time I have got source links which it (transparently) labeled as "ads". AI chat based advertising might be the next thing, be careful.


At the very least we need free and unlimited access to even think about dethroning Google.


Has been for a while due to Bing chat.


"In researching the genealogies of America’s political elite, a Reuters examination found that a fifth of the nation’s congressmen, living presidents, Supreme Court justices and governors are direct descendants of ancestors who enslaved Black people.

Among 536 members of the last sitting Congress, Reuters determined at least 100 descend from slaveholders. Of that group, more than a quarter of the Senate – 28 members – can trace their families to at least one slaveholder."

Elsewhere: "Two of the nine sitting U.S. Supreme Court justices – Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch – also have direct ancestors who enslaved people."

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-slav...

This is only politicians, doesn't include former and present business leaders. Wealth may have disappeared at certain points, but the social networks remained and wealth was rebuilt. It's a fascinating read - Barack Obama's ancestors were part of that club!

I understand that many think this was a good decision because logic, but let's hope the same enthusiasm goes into figuring out a way to deal with the disparities that were born back then, at both ends of the spectrum.


There are plenty of trails in India, this one just got advertised. You shouldn't conclude the world is overpopulated by looking at footage from a football cup match.


> You shouldn't conclude the world is overpopulated by looking at footage from a football cup match.

You shouldn't deny India is overpopulated when riding a train there resembles a footclub cup match.


Is Japan over-populated? Tokyo's trains are extremely crowded. Is US over-populated? LA traffic jams are crazy.

What is the definition of over-population? Over what area are you measuring it? Those train images are likely from just one city. There are other places where the trains just run like any other place.


India is such an outlier as a country... it's a unique combination of both massive absolute population of 1.4B+ and density of over 1000/mi^2.

We can split hairs about other places, and obviously lots of places have their population/crowding issues. The planet has a lot of people.

But India is just not useful as a data point for blaming social media for these phenomena because it's such an outlier. Practically anything informing the people of India of something somewhere of interest is going to generate a thundering herd of exceptional proportion. You don't need social media's help.


But where is that 1000/mi^2 measured? Because I went to plenty of places in India where I saw no one or very few people for a long time driving or hiking. It sounds, like always, this is looking at cities and around cities. Most countries are pretty empty if you don’t want to live in a city (and fortunately, I don’t).


These really make you appreciate the transistor, don’t they.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: