Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tutorialmanager's commentslogin

MA gerrymandered their state to 100% dems in the early 90s. Was that the start of the cold civil war?


So if I report less income, prices for me go down and no penalty if I get caught.


This is only a half-response, but I think one beneficial policy to increase food-access would be to remove regressive sales taxes from grocery purchases. Replace lost revenue with a progressive tax.

Several states tax a considerable amount on even basic foodstuffs (e.g. Tennessee).


All of NPR's 87 editorial board members are registered Democrats. That should give some indication of where they are on left versus right.


Just like police departments use asset forfeiture to get money to buy their “toys” while innocent people lose their cash and cars because carrying cash is suspicious.


From what I saw, a "massive" amount of the left had no problem with FBI agents repeatedly lying to the FISA court to get warrants to spy on the opposing parties presidential campaign. Everyone on both sides knows the other side is full of criminals so anything against them is OK. There is no good ending to this situation.


> Everyone on both sides knows the other side is full of criminals so anything against them is OK

Yet only one side is literally dismantling the country, department by department, and selling off chunks to the richest man in the world.

The richest man in the world, who keeps appearing next to the president in interviews besides not being elected by anyone for anything.


You're regurgitating a thoroughly bunked talking point. The "both sides" enlightened centrism serves exactly one side and you know which one it is.


[flagged]


no idea why you are rejecting healthcare and social security, But power to you I suppose.


Social Security is a a scam. If individuals were allowed to keep their contributions and invest them in the stock market—for example, in index funds like VOO and chill then nearly every American could retire as a millionaire, making traditional 401k unnecessary.


Okay, tell that to the 65+ demographic who were offered pensions and promises of a new deal from their parents. Stocks werent what they were back then before we surrendered our riches to billionaires. A pension was probably way safer than investing unless you already worked in the economic sector.

I'm a millenial and was raised early expecting social security to run out by the time I retire. Not the first time society pulled the ladder up on me.


It was the new deal democrats who stole riches from Americans to put in Fort Knox and foisted this scam on America. It has become a slush fund for the government with hundreds of crooks hands in the cookie jar. It needs to be dissolved, and those who will be worse off by investments will continue to get paid and those who would do better would have it privatized in a staged approach to its dissolution. Removing the parasites in DC by reducing most of the federal government and reducing military spending will help with allocating funds to assist with it's dissolution.


What a mouthful of pretty rhetoric

“Slush fund” “crooks” “cookie jar” “parasites”

But not a single meaningful point brought up or data pointed towards.

It’s a nice easy way to feel like something makes sense without thinking about it.

What are you doing just spouting rhetoric at people who, you know, don’t agree?

> reducing military spending

This needs to happen. It dwarfs non military spending.

But that’ll never happen in the US.


Yeah that's what I thought. You couldn't rebutle any of it.


A great example is the city of Chicago selling its parking meters for 1.15 billion dollars. Now considered one of the biggest financial mistakes the city ever made


Chicago was also involved in the interest rate swap "mis-selling"; see https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/mayor/press_room/press...

Having sold a fairly sophisticated and expensive financial product with nasty downside risks to lots of states and cities, Wall Street then went on to rig the underlying number: https://www.reuters.com/legal/ten-big-banks-settle-us-intere... (although market conditions since the financial crisis would have caused the buyers to lose money anyway)


Also, most of my capital gains are due to inflation and not an increase in value.


Then you really need to pick better investments. Say, any broad market index fund.


I think the point is that it’s not just the wealthy households. Not everyone wants a cabin but most people can afford one.



Most expensive pepper grinder I've seen


I would guess they got less for more money.


7% is approximately how much average inflation would've been for a lot of items.

So you are very likely going to be spot on about getting less for more money.

But this also indicates that, on average, people haven't cut back, despite the inflation.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: