Bound to happen. No other tool can usefully produce a statistical number of spontaneous confessions, evidence of preparing to interfere with the investigation, or evidence of complicity, without needing any truthful inputs at all.
It would be so much more interesting if interframe video analysis could label microexpressions of liars, graphing a level alongside. Preferably, slightly less accurate than the marketing statistics of the American Polygraph Association.
I would say that these kinds of religious edicts discourage investigation and development. The authority to elaborate on dietary taboos is then an expert on an ancient language, (trying to tell if an animal is “cloven hoof” by a murky description) rather than a scientist. Any God not spiteful nor conceited would want us to learn how to boil water; to learn by using thought.
Not exactly, it was more focused on the excess VC deployment into Q-Comm startups in India, but thank you for that information, I now have a lot of research to do tonight
The French c is French, which is the culture with the most-consistent and strongest claims to Celtic heritage.
In German, it’s kelte, same sound as Irish c and Greek kappa.
Maybe we should leave the distinction irrelevant. From the author himself, “ in the nineteenth century many of the scholarly breakthroughs were made by German scholars, who were recognised to be the leaders in this field. Many of them also harboured sympathy for the Celtic regions of Brittany, Ireland, and Wales, and thought they should be freed from French and English imperialism.” And that’s how the word became popular in 1930s Germany.
I’m surprised to hear that Germans in the 1930s thought negatively about English imperialism. My understanding was that the German leadership at the time was impressed by English imperialism in the way you might be impressed by a financially successful cousin. Do you know if this view was like a populist view of the people but not the leadership, or if it was a niche view among the people, or have I got the views of the leadership wrong?
Germany also had some very liberal and intellectual pockets in the, 20’s before Nazi takeover. It wouldn’t be that surprising if the view of German academics in the 30’s reflected that.
I haven’t read the book, but his other interviews sound like it covers that in between episodes on Ireland. Be prepared for Nazi “mistakes” about ethnicities that conveniently justify invasion.
I think that’s right: from 300 AD to 1700, nobody used the word. Medieval Latin dominated in the meantime, and so preferred a soft c in Celtae without an academic to insist on the k in Keltoi.
It would be so much more interesting if interframe video analysis could label microexpressions of liars, graphing a level alongside. Preferably, slightly less accurate than the marketing statistics of the American Polygraph Association.