> Let me guess. You also want to abolish the second amendment.
I don't.
> Why don't you just move to somewhere they don't have those rights. Like in south america. They don't have guns, free speech, anything like that. Like brazil, venezuela, or ecuador.
It's almost like you deliberately chose the least charitable interpretation of my point to avoid rebutting the actual argument I was making.
Here's an example of a doctrine that likely wouldn't run afoul of the first amendment (impinging on neither freedom of speech, the press, or religion). These also likely wouldn't impinge on the second amendment, nor steer us towards economic disaster:
* You can record in a public place
* You cannot use facial recognition software on the recording without the consent of those that were recorded
* Provide some limited exceptions to the above for small-scale private purposes or academic research
foobar.com never has access to cookies from google.com. when requests are sent to google.com, cookies are added. when you load google.com, JS can access the google.com cookies.
google analytics: google.com tracking cookie is to identify the user. the js in the page knows the current website and tells google "im here". the dominance of google analytics and adsense means users are tracked wherever they go (because google is always there and recording)
However, the browser can choose not to send any cookies to google.com when making requests to google from mycuteblog.com.
It's known as blocking third-party cookies, a setting in most browsers. It does sometimes break when auth flows use separate domains to hold auth cookies, and other valid use-cases.
I am all for receiving free stuff and not having to pay for it. The only problem is that is impossible (unless you are a nordic country where the government owns the black gold pumping industry. (even then its not sustainable))
There is more than enough money to go around in the US. Just look at the wealth controlled by the top 1%. The only question is whether will we have a John Galt type of situation or not. A lot of people contend that this myth is total bullshit and Ayn Rand was an idiot.
Money doesn’t do anything except direct the flow of labor and resources. Which labor are you going to take away and what are you going to take raw resources away from? What are you going to redirect them to do?
Interesting. I feel the opposite. I can write JS way faster than C or python. JS is much more forgiving and less restrictive than those other languages.
edit: gotta love the downvotes for voicing your opinion. LOL
I previously considered the idea of creating a cloud storage solution where customers are only billed for what they use. This was spurred by looking at dropbox's $10/mo plan for 1TB of storage. But I decided against it.
Storage is already free for the average user. 15GB with Google is enough. If you want more, the option is there and not that expensive. $2/mo for 100GB. I see no reason why a consumer would switch to my lesser-known service to save $1/mo. $1 is nothing. So my market would be users that store a lot of data. In that case, $10/mo for 1TB doesn't seem all that bad. Anymore than 1TB, customers probably have a bit of technical knowledge and may aswell store it themselves.
This market is already extremely saturated. Every single big tech name has a part of it.
