So they provide full information on what happened, with all legal papers attached at the end, and a link to a site that gives you a list of all "blocked sites" that where effected by that order.
While the outcome is quite unfortunate, the way they provide all info here seams like a plus in my book here.
If a state/entity comes after your org tomorrow, and you got to either fight legally or leave the market (like cisco in the story), what would you do?
I think the France legislation is aimed at most major resolvers. You might get away with more niche ones for now, but the only stable way is to self-host a recursive resolver (like unbound) that walk the DNS tree themselves.
Hosting is never hard. It's about maintainability. How do you handle HA? How will you expose the service? What about backups? How efficiently are you running it? That's just the tip of the iceberg. For an average joe, this is not something they wanna deal with
You are doing a bare minimum job which is of course not what I intended. Your workloads doesn't seem to be that sensitive. If you can afford a few minutes of downtime, sure. I cannot afford downtime because lots of critical services will fail which will require manual intervention
