Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tke248's comments login

An Insurance Pool, funded by rental fees, covers losses from fraud, with smart contracts tracking transactions and managing claims.


Before I begin, I will say that I've been falling asleep listening to Ray Dalio's "Principles" on audiobook. I also have listened to recordings of quite a few of his speeches (including the recent one at All-In Summit)

My initial reaction was to reply, "I'm not paying for a service that charges me when other people lose their goods." But that's exactly what every company does, they just don't call it that.

Next, I wanted to say "I'm not paying for a service that blatantly charges me for that." But that's not right either.

I just...I don't understand this level of complexity. This may be the Dalio fever speaking, but is this what "radical transparency" means? The customer gets to know about every financial detail of the products they're casually using?

Most consumers don't want or need to know about everything that goes in the dog food. We know some of it's bad. We don't want to shop around various services for the best "insurance to profit" ratio or something. No one does that for health insurance, let alone video rental insurance.

The beauty of modern consumerism is that you see one number - a price. That can inform every decision the consumer makes. The informed consumer (i.e. the one with more free time) may dig into the details, but ultimately everyone has certain items when they really, really don't care about the company or the quality - they just want the best price.

This behavior allows the individual to shed a lot of cognitive load and stop thinking about things that they don't want to think about. It also represents a lot of what's wrong with consumerism today

You should really work on refining your idea. Consider this it's first exposure to oxygen. Maybe I'm 100% wrong too. Good luck.


The token pays for access to the network and funds the purchase of videos and lets you vote on what's purchased next, since it would be decentralized and you wouldn't be paying people the monthly costs would be limited to website upkeep and cost of postage.


The Reputation System tracks user behavior, automatically banning individuals like Devious Dan after several fraudulent actions such as sending empty envelopes.


I'm sure that Bullshitter Bob will be glad to know that the system believes his fake reports, and he'll enjoy the stolen DVDs too.


what if they change wallets or keys?


I envision a system where the token covers the cost of your initial contribution, equivalent to the price of two DVDs, approximately $40. This not only funds the DVDs but also grants you access to our network. With the upfront cost accounted for, we can then set a more affordable monthly charge, leveraging the reduced overhead costs. Importantly, the reputation is tied to the token itself, not the wallet. So even if a user changes wallets, any fraudulent activity or complaints associated with the token will persist. After a set number of infractions or complaints, the token will be revoked. To regain access to the network, the user would need to purchase a new token.


It's not valuable enough to be a company but I would buy a token to get access to obscure movies every now and then.


If they were making 150M in revenue and had a million subscribers some people derived value from the service. Not everyone has good internet connections and the selection was much larger.


The involvement of blockchain is totally unnecessary. Netflix was able to mail DVDs to people using the Post Office.


Ok smart people how can I create a dropdown list at the top of this that will allow me to select my onsite Llama instance or use Chatgpt api instead


Have you tried asking ChatGPT?


Not yet was hoping someone already has a project going


Will chatgpt even know?

This is past 2021.


I had an In-Mouth device idea that might have a potentially bigger market and easier to make if you need a pivot idea: https://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/12kunua/explori...


Seems like we should be testing geoengineering in deserts first before we try it in much harsher environments like Mars. I think desalinated ocean water via low tech solar might be a good way to start - https://inhabitat.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2016/08/F...


My understanding is that desalinization should be a method of last resort, since it produces a lot of brine that is hard to deal with at scale in a way that isnt bad for the marine life. Depending on the desert, dew collectors might work, although I havent looked into how much water sphagnum moss needs over a year, now much a dew collector can produce, how much evaporation would happen, etc.


I had a good fireproof safe burn once it fused the sand or whatever material is between the layers of metal. I was never able to get back into it.


I have a theory that solar flares are the cause of some hard drive failures would be interesting to see if a few lead shielded cases would reduce the number of failures. I used to manage a large fleet of computers and anytime we got radio interference from solar flares we would have 3-5 hard drive failures that day.


Any sufficiently large cluster is effectively a cosmic ray detector with terrible sensitivity.


What were the failure modes? Was it corrupted data or were the drives permanently fried?


Corrupt data that would compromise the Operating systems, these were Dell computers with multiple different branded hard drives they would have us run their hardware diagnostic tool that would put them in the range to receive a free replacements. We didn't have to send back the old ones under the contract we had with them they would still work when reformatted but were less reliable after that.


So far I always assumed that, when talking about HDDs failing rates, they where considering the typical mechanical failure. I never considered that they could declare a failure due to some corrupted data, although it would be reasonable for a datacenter to do so.


Mechanical failures were more prevalent in my experience in 90s, most of the recent stuff is usually see are controller failures. I rarely hear any head crash clicking like the old days


If you didn't disable the write cache on those drives, flares could have caused bit flips in the cache memory before it was flushed to disk.


Out of what fleet size?


Around a 1000


Its weird to me how classified documents could be floating around most are generated in a SKIF and live there with people who know how to care for them properly. When I dealt with classified info it was always on a completely segregated network even the cables were protected and the network traffic is encrypted with specialized hardware(not possible to email to anyone but another authorized person). Higher level officers Colonels and Generals etc could have classified safes in their offices if they were in a protected buildings but nobody was taking anything home and logs were kept in the safe as to what was in it and random inspections would take place to confirm its accuracy.


Yup! It seems to me with all the floating around of classified paper docs, it's past time to start embedding logging devices in the binders.

I'm pretty sure that tech is now sufficiently advanced that we could embed a near-unnoticeable device logging locations, all nearby WiFi/Bluetooth/devices, and maybe even pics of surroundings every time it moves or is opened, and enough power to keep it running for years.


I think its time to stop printing stuff out this would prevent lots of the risk and if your position is overran like an embassy or base powering down devices would keep them safe


Does autohotkey have keyboard and mouse recording function when I first learned about scripting 20 years ago Winbatch had that function which took a non-programmer who just wanted to speed up repetitive tasks into an entry level programmer after a few weeks of use.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: