Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | throwaway124219's comments login

I went to high school at the time (in Europe) and could create decent looking websites. I could have made a decent income from making web sites for businesses, but the idea of finding someone to host it on proper servers (with domain names) and actually sell and market it to customers were too foreign to me. Computers were expensive, so even if I found a place to host it for cheap, the machine was too much for my budget. You couldn't sell a website to a business and place it on Geocities...

Looking back at it now, the only truly difficult part (for me) was the infrastructure. I have heard stories about people just cold calling a merchant and sell a quick "home page" for $500 + hosting fees within minutes, and just generated a static page from a template with a logo, name and contact details. It was a gold rush where the right people with the right skills could make easy money.

Some of them were lucky enough to live in cities with local ISPs and hosted the sites on their personal PCs on a dial-up. People didn't expect much from the web at the time. I simply didn't have that kind of knowledge and risk taking ability at the time. My personal network did not contain any people who could have pointed me in the right direction either.

I'm kind of envious of today's youth, because they seem to have a better awareness of the business side of things and easily available technologies.


Impossible for CSS, but not for the pragmatists who used tables for layout

    <td valign="middle">


At that time, 486 was probably the minimum target they would expect it to run on. Pentiums had also started to become more affordable by 1997.


Sure, it was very ambitious to run something like a 16-bit version of Composer on such a low spec machine, but I still gave it a go :D

This was around 1995. I didn’t suffer too long with Composer on my 386, I got sick of the swapping pretty quickly and stuck with Notepad for a long time afterwards.

I didn’t upgrade my 386 PC until 1998 (couldn’t afford to), when I got a Cyrus 6x86, which is another story altogether. If you know about Quake and FPU performance with the 6x86, then you already know the story.


I had a 486 SX2, and not DX2, so I feel your pain regarding math and games...


For me, XP is the one I prefer. It looks more "modern" than 98 but not as "glossy" as 7. It has the right balance of better looking buttons and radios, but doesn't go too far


xp looks with 7 taskbar drag-ability would be the sweet spot for me (reckon this ends up comparable to a tame xfce panel too)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: