I think you have completely misunderstood why most people wants dogs. Sure, there are a few that view them as accessories, but they are in the minority.
The dog owners I know, see them as companions and friends. There's no feeling of superiority or domination.
The reason they want to "get" a new dog when their old dog die, is because they are in deep grief over the loss of a family member and wants to feel a connection again
That still fundamentally treats them as objects to be used for self benefit. They didn't value the pet as "Billy", they value the pet as a "the dog". They only value it insofar as it fulfills its expected duties like following arbitrary commands for the owner's entertainment. I've seen some good pet owners but the vast majority do very much seem to use their pets as accessories.
It's like those people who put adult-styled clothing on babies who have absolutely no ability to comprehend style or aesthetic and are absolutely suffering because those bulky-ass baby jeans take 20 minutes to force on and are just impossible to exist in without crying because of the fundamental nature of size and thickness relativity, and a bow bigger than their head, oh and we HAVE to have the shoes, no not those, the ones that match; can you hold her still she won't quit fighting me while I'm putting these shoes on her. We're gonna be late for her award ceremony.
These people will invariably be disappointed when their property exerts its agency and doesn't do "what they had planned for it". "Where did we go wrong? Why didn't they turn out the way we wanted" they'll ask...
> treats them as objects to be used for self benefit
Wow.
This means everyone I've ever met in my entire life is a multi-time objectifier of women/men/pets/etc. We've all sought out new partners and friends upon losing others.
I feel for you, because it seems you have such a lost idea for people and relationships. You're projective all these bitter ideas that I've never ever in 38y observed in my life/others.
People spend a fortune of money and time on what you perceive as a label/symbol
This simply don't match my experience. You should consider if you have had an experience out of the ordinary that has formed your views.
> They didn't value the pet as "Billy", they value the pet as a "the dog".
I know people with multiple dogs, and they are treated as individuals with their own motivations and habits. They are still dogs, so we should be careful about treating them as a child replacement. But most of those I know treat them with respect.
When a dog dies, they often don't want an identical dog to replace them, because they know that they can't get their dog back.
> They only value it insofar as it fulfills its expected duties like following arbitrary commands for the owner's entertainment
None of the people I know forces the dog to do tricks for food or "roll over" for amusement. They focus on useful stuff like "come here", "sit", "stay" etc. These are only used as a form of communication and only in situations where they are needed.
When one of those dogs tries to escape their prison, what happens? They are hunted down and returned to their cell. Best case scenario they find another prison with nicer guards and they are "allowed" to transfer. If the old prison wants them back, it can forcibly take them.
But I guess I see why it has to be that way. There's nowhere on Earth left to go that hasn't been turned into a prison other than the uninhabitable places.
Yes, Intellj will recognize that the string in my code is an SQL statement and use auto complete and validation when it is connected to a database.
I've looked at the announcement and it seems that the functionality of Jetbrains is similar.