Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | thoutsnark's comments login

Which suggests rehab might be better than prison for getting these people to give up violence.

Try walking while carrying a heavy load.


That's just regular walking. Life is hard!


I walk quickly in ellipses when I'm power-thinking.


Ah the infamous farmer's walk!


I strongly agree with your main point that pythons syntax design is objectively poor, but content that even the grace you seek to extend to it is wrong

>Python encodes structure in only one way, using indentation

Except when you write a multiple line string using """ notation.

Or when you put things inside parenthesis, which i have seen as the preferred solution for method chaining.

Point is, python claims indentation is all that is needed, and then very quickly breaks it's own rule.


Open parentheses and "multi-line" strings are simply Python's way to allow a single statement to span multiple lines in a nicer way: incomplete expressions continue across the newline (you can also do that with a common Unix way of escaping the newline — backslash right before you start the new line). FWIW, even """ notation does not require a string to be multi-line — it mostly allows using less escaping for things like newlines but also quotes.

A preferred way to chain methods is to store values in descriptively named intermediate variables: it would also ease debugging as you'll get a direct pointer to the line that is problematic. Though, TBH, that's probably bad API design (I know it's common with DB query syntax, but that's attempting to turn SQL query construction into objects when they really aren't).

Python, like most languages, doesn't really stop you from doing crazy stuff. But also like most languages, it can be done really well.


The gibberish was dubunked, correct.

The neuroscience, which is nuanced and complex, continues to prove valid. Our two hemispheres process the world differently.


Wait, so the only option besides doomscrolling is to hold something else against your face?

How about not looking at a screen? [Escape the matrix]


My sentiments aside, I'd like to know if it will actually help, and if my ebook reader (which doesn't scroll) is actually okay. So, looks like they could have extracted more knowledge here...


I don't think anyone is confused whether hiking or doomscrolling is better for you.

But to understand the mechanism behind the claim in the title it would be useful to know whether social media plays a role here, or if it's continuous scrolling, or something entirely different. Understanding that might not make people go outside more, but it would help make the things people are already doing less harmful.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: