Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | thedaly's comments login


> Something I’ve noticed people do more of recently for whatever reason is talking over others.

I've noticed this as well and I posit this is a result of increased use of remote communication and meetings platforms such as zoom since 2020.

My inclination is that the behavior will not correlate with interrupting chatgpt or siri. Seems totally separate to me.


It’s an American thing. I noticed it when I moved here a decade ago. If I wait for a silent moment to speak in a group, it’ll literally never arrive


And all networking configuration and everything else is transferred with close to zero effort?


You could roll your own SDN with the likes of wireguard.


I suspect that when AT&T built all the COs (1950-70s) they were constrained by both max number of lines and physical distance.

You’ll see numerous COs in a big city, but they are also pretty widely dispersed throughout the suburbs and rural areas.


I worked for Southwestern Bell in the 90s pre-SBC (aka just before remote terminals and dslams became common). COs handled mid-tens of thousands of lines in big cities, for smaller more rural areas they generally covered a single town or less often there were a few in a county where the full county was under 50k people.

In towns, we generally tried to keep loop lengths under 30k feet, but in rural areas that simply wasn’t possible. You’d often find remnants of party line systems in those areas and definitely load coils out the wazzoo. It was “fun” unwinding all that crap to install ISDN circuits and later DSL.

I remember the old hats at the time laughing about VDSL saying “leave it to the nerds to dream up some unrealistic shit where the loop length can be at most 2k feet, where does that exist!?” not realizing a few years later RTs and DSLAMs would mean a significant portion of city and suburban customers would be.


I used to work at BellSouth in outside plant engineering in the early 2000s. That's exactly what it was. Of course, by then any expansion was done via remote terminals and COs were becoming very antiquated.


>COs were becoming very antiquated.

I mean COs are integral in AT&T's architecture, it's where every fiber connection lands on an OLT


Anecdotally, this seems to be much less prevalent in the US due to cultural differences. I live in Chicago and their is a 7 cent surcharge for bags. I'd say 1/3 of people actually bring their own even after this has been in place for years.


33% is a change over 0 at scale.


People brought their own bags long before plastic bags were banned.

I don’t think we were starting from 0


> The other is that Chinese workers are 30% (or 2X?) more efficient than American workers.

What metrics is this based on?


The "two countries with very different labor laws" metric, I imagine.


Yeah, now that I think about it, I never see any screenshots on reddit either. I see tons from twitter.


Who is downloading threads? Haven't read or heard any talk on it in months. To be fair, I am far removed from the meta ecosystem.


I switched from twitter to threads pretty much immediately and traffic there comes and goes in waves when people get freshly annoyed at twitter about something. Most of the people I followed on twitter have threads accounts -- most of them crosspost there frequently, some of them only do when they're mad about something elon musk did and then go back to twitter.


I'm prevented from using it because I don't have an instagram account and I don't really want to download another app to sign up for this one.


The most obvious answer is people who can't stand Tucker Carlson or Alex Jones types. Lots of high profile political accounts have moved over from X. In the politics vein, lots of Ukrainian and Ukraine watchers as well, oddly enough. Aside from that, some machine learning accounts are pretty decent and have a growing community. - my 2¢


This may be a dumb question, but wouldn't one only see that content if they engage with it or follow people who engage with it?


An algorithmic feed of posts and replies within a post means that you see whatever an optimization function thinks will maximize revenue and engagement. And people on both sides fall for the bait and engage when they're shown what they disagree with.


You would think so, but it sure feels like all of the ad slots in my feed are almost always inundated with promoted posts from random rage-baiters on the right. I even muted "Trump" and a bunch of other politics-talk and still see it daily through ads.

Add to the fact that X is also trialing ads that don't get labeled as ads [1] (and just get promoted to your stream as if they're a normal post, but still have the "Why am I seeing this ad?" etc context menu), and it seems like there's more and more avenues every day for content to creep into your feed whether you interact with it or not.

[1] https://adguard.com/en/blog/twitter-x-ads-unlabelled-musk.ht...


Yes, you can absolutely curate your feed by following what you want to see more of, marking suggested tweets you don't like as see less often, block people etc. This is a non-issue.


Space, CPU cycles, attention. So much waste


This is one of those posts that reminds me why I love this site so much.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: