Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | thavalai's commentslogin

In case any one else runs into a "this video is not available outside the UK" message, I'm able to see it here: https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/my-garden-thousand-bees-abou...

I liked this deconstruction of Wordle a lot: https://bert.org/2021/11/24/the-best-starting-word-in-wordle...


Financial Independence/Retire Early. One forum: https://www.reddit.com/r/financialindependence/


Just wanted to point out that besides creating Typescript, Anders has been the Lead Architect on C# since 2000.


For the past couple of years I have been the lead designer of C#. Anders and I took a break to help create TypeScript, and then he stayed on as it's lead designer, while I returned to take over C#.

Anders and I meet every week to compare notes, and I make sure to get his input on major new features in C#.


Apparently he is mostly focused on Typescript nowadays, and not so much on C#, although he still participates on its development.

At least given his latest interviews on Channel 9 and BUILD sessions.


He was also the original author of Turbo Pascal and the chief architect of Delphi.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Hejlsberg


The seeming "idolization" is probably to make up for what he wrote about Bezos (and Amazon) in his famous "accidentally public" post that preceded it: https://plus.google.com/+RipRowan/posts/eVeouesvaVX


"But of your job is to look at data and make descisions based on that data, you're gonna be the first to go."

"The last people to be replaced are going to be software devs"

If your job is to write code so people can look at data and make decisions based on that data, you're gonna be the second to go.


Lots of commenters seem to think that programmers are safe for a while. As a programmer, I sincerely hope they are right.

But, the majority of developers I know, including myself, are ultimately writing software to be used by humans, typically presenting data that is comprehensible to humans, so that they can make decisions.

If AI advances to the point where similar decisions can be made by machines, looking at the same data, then I fear that entire classes of applications will disappear, and with them, the need for developers who build them.

Obviously, we'll still need developers, though perhaps far fewer than are needed today. Perhaps software development will go through the same revolution that agriculture did, where from we went from > 90% to < 3% of the population being involved.


This is already nascent, but growing quickly, in a field typically called things like "robotic process automation" or "cognitive computing". Essentially, eliminating the need for wide swaths of CRUD and business process enterprise applications, and the developers who create them (and the sysadmins who support them, etc etc).


Sounds like "before" was five years ago.

I'm curious to read parts 1 & 2, wish there were clear links to them in "Part 3".


Part one is linked, though not clearly, from the article.[0]

Checking the category under which this was posted, Rants, gets you to number two in a single page where a good old Mark I eyeball grep is enough to get you there with some brief scrolling.[1]

(I was curious, too.)

[0] https://asylum.madhouse-project.org/blog/2011/12/13/google-f...

[1] https://asylum.madhouse-project.org/blog/2012/08/21/recruitm...


I got excited about this, as I live in MA and seriously considering a change, until I read the part that it doesn't go into effect until July 2018.


You should try a clipboard manager (on Windows, I use 'ditto.' Search for 'ditto clipboard manager.')


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: