What you probably mean is puzzle solving intelligence. Humor is a form of intelligence. It's just not only about intelligence - it's also about values, and context, for instance. But all this reflects a form of intelligence. Neverthless, intelligence shouldn't be ranked, at least not in the way we are used to talk about it.
Yes, that sound indeed hard. Do you think it's possible by using memory usage patterns, GPU and RAM consumption levels, etc.? I didn't read this, but sounds interesting: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15847?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Books are so poorly written that they are only useful because of the exercises, table of contents and as a consulting guide to see relevant equations and images. They could easily be 1/3 the size and have the same impact.
For concepts, I only use AI.
And probably openstax.org is enough anyway, in terms of books. They do a better job for free that most publishers with lots of recommendations that charge hundreds. Then you have a lot of exercises provided by some american colleges that I assume will also be enough.
I just used Gemini as an OCR a couple of hours ago because all the OCR apps I tried on android failed at the task lol
Wild seeing this commment right after waking up
Honestly, from the stories I hear... Obviously,the money is one factor, but even if people got a little bit more money, they would still go for a PhD (at least in europe, where you don't need to go under debt so much, if you need to). The problem is that a lot of people don't even receive more money than people with Msc or even less. That's just too bad (even if in some countries this is not only illegal, but people actually follow the law - which is not something you should take for granted).
But even after the money consideration... you still have all the "lost credibility" in the system, because the institutions are not properly funded, and also because science is very dependent on grants,politics, and stupid criteria + nepotism and corruption inside the institutions, etc. That goes beyond PhD applications to even "who can sell the coffee in campus". On PhD apps, I will never forget when one of my housemate just said to me that he would leave the country because one teacher said to him in advance that he would not enter on PhD, because everything was bought out.
I think this is only the ""beginning"" of at least 10+ years of colleges having a hard time/ losing credibility year after year (sometimes because they are failing, and other times because they dare to have opinions different than people like Musk, which is not fair for academia). Either way, should I feel sorry for them? For the institutions, sure. But for the people who rule the institutions right now? My only fear is that they will be substituted by even worse individuals.
How do you identify bots and low quality reviews in general?
I believe the problem exists, but I'm afraid the problem is that the platforms who perform reviews with high quality reviewers don't have enough reviewers for the reviews to appear centralized enough to be useful.
