For ambiguous or intricate prompts, the immediate response protocol should be a clarifying question: 'Are you looking for A, B, C, or something else?' Tokens and advanced reasoning capabilities should be reserved until the user provides clarification.
A benchmark score should reflect the quality of the conversation as a whole, rather than isolated responses.
Even setting aside ethics and faith, from the perspective of the norm of reciprocity, being kind to travelers (or those who appear to be) is effective in winning them over as allies. In my personal experience, the more aggressive a person is, the more likely they are to be hyper-vigilant or starved for kindness, meaning they tend to be deeply moved by even a small gesture. Of course, genuine psychopaths in confined environments are the exception.
This is an extreme case, but a certain murderer (from a real incident in Japan) stated : "I just wanted to kill anyone. So, I stabbed the person who ignored me when I greeted them."
> In a perfect world however... endless cooling water unless they're in some shallow harbor. Would be the perfect application.
Still not, because all it takes is one thing going Seriously Fucking Wrong on another ship and boom, you got yourself a nuclear disaster. Just look at the Francis Scott Key Bridge and imagine that that ship hadn't hit a bridge support but a nuclear powered vessel.
Nuclear powered ships only make sense for ships operating in places where there is no other ship in sight for hundreds of miles (i.e. icebreakers) or for military ships that can and will shoot and sink anything with the potential of becoming a threat.
The germans tried that in the 60s see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Hahn_(ship).
It was uneconomical.
You need specialized engineers for that, you need special permissions for ports and the important canals are off limits due to risk.
reply