Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sysguest's commentslogin

well we have galaxy fold tablet-as-phone, so... maybe not all is lost?

idk maybe TextEdit DOES have some rce not discovered yet?

maybe we should separate "real origianl text-only editor" from "fancy text editor"?

windows already got wordpad... why even lay a finger on textpad?


Windows had wordpad but it was discontinued two years ago : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WordPad

wat?????

wtf why?????????


So you subscribe to the Microsoft CoPilot 365 App or whatever it's called now.

hmm... ok maybe that's reasonable

charge extra premium for a "secure vanilla-text™ pure unadulterated wysiwyg editor" experience should be a thing for the "security-minded" enterprises


that's.... really clever

well wouldn't it add up?

someWhatRandom1 xor someWhatRandom2 xor notRandom3 xor ...

should be more 'random' than just 'someWhatRandom1'


XOR is the worst hashing function imaginable, especially if the data isn't truly random, because it can cancel out to become even less random!

It's better to use a KDF or something. Even a block cipher should work far better than XOR.


i'm not sure it would necessarily be more random if you're mixing in a lower-entropy source which the accelerometer probably is

idk you can just use simple liquid-container or sticker?

maybe apple was preparing for "carrying-around laptop experience"?


That's an entirely different product build path compared to the electronics production line though.

If a pick and place machine can drop it on and reflow it, that's what you want.


well it would be hardened when contact with air or something

see "Shipping Damage Indicators"


hmm but wouldn't that rapidly spend my tokens?


Effective use of LLMs in this way is not cheap.


+1

if you're not the person-in-complete-power, your bet is really likely to be 'rigged' against you

I'd rather play dice or buy lotteries


> yet we ended up outsource our factories and the entire sector withered.

hmm outsourcing doesn't contradict Jevon's paradox ?


You're right. I updated it to "in a single sector". The context is about the future demand of software engineers, hence I was wondering if it would be possible that we wouldn't have enough demand for such profession, despite that the entire society will benefit for the dropping unit cost and probably invented a lot of different demand in other fields.


hmm maybe this can be easily solved?

1. make a starlink+wireless mesh-network (eg. using BLE) that can handle multiple connects/disconnects seamlessly

2. mount those starlinks on cars/trucks/motorcycles/etc. hide those on ditches, buildings, etc.

Elon should work on that "starlink <-> wireless mesh-network" part (eg. app or device)


Terminals are easy to find.

Every single commercial mobile satellite system, other than VSAT needs to tell the network where it is in order to function. None of them are designed for low probability of interception/detection.


well that's why you need to move around


But this is getting pretty complicated for private citizens without internet access to organize with the protests, sanctions, falling currency and government killing thousands of people, no?


That’s not going to save you when your adversary can continuously track your position, and identify your pattern of life.


> easily solved

Asynchronous (you don't know when and where you will get Internet/local network connectivity) mesh (there is no gov infrastructure to be trusted) networking in presence of malicious (gov operated) and unreliable (destroyed by gov) nodes is probably among hardest problems known to computer science.


Or Starlink enables direct to cell 5G in Iran.


> Elon should work

Elon? You mean the team behind starlink? The cult of personality around this nerd is amazing


Umm, executive prioritization genuinely determines what gets built. "Design for LPI/LPD" is exactly the kind of strategic call that comes from leadership, not something engineers spontaneously add to the roadmap.

That said, the technical problem is hard regardless. Direction-finding equipment can locate them. Moving helps but you are broadcasting position whenever active. Military SATCOM (MUOS, AEHF) uses frequency hopping, directional antennas, burst transmissions, techniques Starlink was not architected for.

The mesh idea has a bandwidth mismatch problem too. BLE tops out around 1 Mbps; Starlink pushes 100+. You would want 802.11s or a MANET protocol, but then you just have a cluster of RF emitters pointing back at the terminal anyway.


agreed

on tech side, I'm not wireless-guy, so I'm giving ble as an example ('something like ble') not as some prescription

btw, maybe elon could add those SATCOM features to starlink? (or is it physically costly -- eg. require changing those satelite hardwares? or would some software update do?)


hmm so who should I refer to?

should I call out bill gates? zuckerberg?


Just say Starlink or SpaceX, obviously. When would you ever say "Bill should work on fixing Outlook" or "Mark should improve the WhatsApp gif picker"??


gif picker lol


"on which step of the ladder do you feel you personally stand at the present time?”

hmm maybe answering 10 means: I only expect my life to down-roll from now on?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: