Step 0:
Stop aiming for 10k, aim for enough to live (for now).
Then decide between option1 or 2.
Option 1:
Start by taking a "random IT integrator/service job" to keep your flat and food on the table, stop even thinking about building and "vibing" something.
Just take a job, large "consulting" companies are easy to join as entry-level and will give you enough to survive, but far from your 10k dream.
Stabilise your finances, take time to refine your ideas and plan the next step without the stress to not knowing if you will be homeless or hungry next month.
Option 2:
Play the local lottery and tomorrow, GOTO option 1
Thanks, that is exactly what I have been doing, I'm trying to get some jobs relentlessly right now just to get some traction. I think it just that one stressfull thought of homelessness that it eating me up.
let's be honest option 1: is non-viable in this economy - those places are not hiring & most places are not hiring.
only viable option in an economy that's not hiring is to hire yourself - but don't swing for the fences - just small scale stuff e.g 250 people paying you $40/month
Congrats, 1y on the same side-project (it is one I understood correctly) is already an achievement.
Task management is complicated and very different based on the person/context (Startup vs large org).
I know both universes well, and while reading your first page, I found "Only one task "in-progress" per user for focused productivity." -> I stopped here.
As engineer and manager of engineers I don't have one task in mind, I have hundreds, found me a way to visualise and make sense of all that and you would have my interest, not looking for another toggle-like app.
Second feedback: sorry, but I have the same issue; design is key.
Based on the home page and lack of screenshots, I am fairly confident that you are a developer and not a hybrid unicorn able to create complete professional software without some help on the design/UX front.
Thanks for the pointer, we'll consider this. This is currently an attempt to direct the energy we found in our direct surroundings towards some form of collaboration. Doesn't contradict joining efforts.
Sweeping ideological educational programs such as Hitler Jugend and Marxism (or even today's Klimatism) are always a response to a perceived issue, or a perceived roadmap toward a goal. In that case, unless you can offer counter-argument, dogmatic ideological education tie these concepts together. Second point, once prosperity and wealth are not the future of a nation, things happen quickly in a direction anyone interested in history recognizes. Im interested in discussing principles of things taking into account the context of socio-economic situation. Can you argue how the proposal for ideological dogma for your children is not a dangerous idea?
Dogma are "bad" if not challenged, correct.
Can we adapt/change these programs along the flow, to adapt to the new situations and knowledge? I am confident we can.
Now, what are you proposing to really change the mindset of the world population around climate change and the fact we are running into the wall?
the other option is the current one, we do close to nothing and we wait.
Not convinced about this strategy to prepare a better future for the planet and the next generations.
There are many scholars studying bureaucratic processes and if anything can be learned from this is that it is by design and nature of its function that bureaucracy is not able of adaptation to changing conditions (in timely fashion), nay, it will resist the exact thing you deem to be the core of a good educational policy (adaptability). In short, I would conclude that the confidence you posses on this very point is misplaced in my view. And it is precisely that which is inherently dangerous in it.
What am I proposing to change the mindset of masses around climate change, you ask. I do not want to bifurcate the topic here by unpacking the world view encapsulate in this (Its not that it is all wrong or such, but it is hardly so simple). However, I want to pick out from this the concept that "masses are to be manipulated for their own good by the enlightened elites" as a appalling one, and particularly harmful to the way to further advance us in socio-politico-economic phase-space into the future.
What is not the way is to brainwash children with dogma (for dogma drilling necessarily stalls the exact conceptual, systemic thinking we need to better our civilization), no matter how hype or valuable it is perceived to be at a given time. To instill framework of us vs them, or in/out of group dynamics, false sense of understanding, and at the same time extracting populace's allegiance to the "state" to save the day is pathological. What to do next cannot be spelled out in a comment section, and in any case it is input into a debate anyway. However, putting intellectual roadblock to such ill-conceived and inherently rotten ideas such as the one in question here is a must.
USA is starting to do a lot of tests.
Same for Germany.
So virtually keeping the death rate low.
Other countries are testing only people already sick with a lot of symptoms (==hospitalized).
If we were testing "everyone", dead rate would be lower in Italy,...,...
