Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | strix_varius's commentslogin

I've heard exactly the same response before and I shared your reaction.

The other thing that makes "dogfood" make sense is that sometimes you aren't the direct target audience of the product. So: would you feed this to your own dog?


Yes but isn't it a bit weird to be implying your customers are dogs?

Our customers are morons for using our products and dogs are personable but pretty stupid so yea, makes a lot of sense.

Idk some people love dogs a lot. Maybe more than people!

The average person generally seems less than neutral to see me.

Many people aren’t just openly hostile, they make a point to immediately let you know they aren’t here to help, they’re here to make everyone’s life less pleasant.

With people, there are many scenarios where if you’re out of line, disagree, that’s it. You’re done. They’ll never ever consider you worth any reasonable sort of treatment.

Dogs, by comparison, are angels.


No. The idea is until it receives the chef’s kiss, it’s dog food.

I think in the analogy that we're the dogs.

Metaphor confuses, literally.

> the proof is that LLMs _can_ reliably generate (relatively small amounts of) working code from relatively terse descriptions

> Sometimes the interpolated detail is wrong (and indeterministic)

... You consider incorrect, non deterministic results to be "reliable"?


Do you consider the implementation of such specs by another human to (always) be correct and deterministic?

Heck, if I reimplement something I worked on a month ago it’s probably not going to be the exact same. Being non deterministic needn’t to be a problem, as long as it falls within certain boundaries and produces working results.


> I feel like you can't really be considered a staff/principal if you can't already tell ahead of time where the perf bottleneck will be just on experience and intuition.

/s right?

What a red flag that would be!


> I guess that's not happening now.

They're still going with their hybrids of course.

I have a Honda Hybrid CR-V and love the drivetrain. We're waiting until Honda moves that drivetrain into the Odyssey (which is the van we want... probably what you have, hah)



> So an EV is not for you! You just might be one of the unlucky 1% for whom that is true.

Given the data on the trend of EV sales (https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/global...) this is a pretty big claim to make.

I live in an old, pre-automobile neighborhood. Like other such old, walkable, sidewalk-and-park-and-corner-store neighborhoods in the US, it's one of the most attractive parts of my city.

However, almost nobody here could feasibly own a fully electric car. Most houses don't have driveways or garages. People park ad-hoc on the street. Most families own one car, and that car needs to be able to go long distances because it's both the local vehicle and the road tripper.

My wife and I would buy an EV if we could. We know the exact one. But it's not feasible for us, or for our neighbors. Far from being "1%" this situation is quite common. So we have a Honda hybrid instead.

The Toyota strategy from 2022 has aged brilliantly: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/29/toyota-ceo-stands-by-electri...

However, the EV maximalist strategy from the same era has aged like milk.


Try using them to play a twitchy game and you'll notice.

Probably an exaggeration? But I hope that tapping for pause isn't critical for anyone's daily life.

I use wireless headphones and in fact never use this feature (I have it disabled). Too unreliable when there's a large screen with a big pause and skip button within reach.


Urban fantasy is my jam, what's your book?


> Obsolete technologies don't usually get adopted as ways to display wealth.

Is this really true? Mechanical watches. Sailing yachts. Fountain pens. Analog audio...


VHS, The Dewey Decimal system, punchtape programming, fletching, sailmaking


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: