Should work on Chrome, Firefox, Safari, IE, Opera, Edge... any that supports WebGL with OES_standard_derivatives (so basically 99% of browsers according to http://webglstats.com/)
What version of Firefox, OS, GPU, etc. are you using?
Technically, they're wrong because the stats are collected by trackers in sites about WebGL, so there's a bias towards having complete WebGL implementations.
Of course there are more than 1% browsers that support, but we're talking about implementations, not devices. You can can have an old iPhone running iOS pre8 and it won't run WebGL, but one can say that iOS does support WebGL now.
So firefox is a class, and there are instances of that class running. Most instances are running on mobile devices, so it really makes sense to say that only a small minority of browsers are capable of running WebGL.
I'd say most of mobile browsers can run WebGL, it's just that the experiences are not designed for mobile platforms (this Polygon Shredder, for instance, it does work on mobile, it's just too slow to be good, but I can probably make it work)
Firefox beta/Aurora/DeveloperEdition... all but stable have a regression on WebGL and reporting missing extensions support, like OES_texture_float. Most of the three.js recent content will probably not work on them.
Hence the "insane", it means 2048x2048 base particles. That's over 25 million triangles (or 75 million vertices) per pass, and it's done twice (color and shadow mapping). Also the curl noise is pretty expensive, and 2048x2048 is quite a lot of operations. I think the browser locks before being able to allocate all necessary info, and if it does, probably the GPU can't keep up. Not everyone's card can push that much, but I've seen people getting to 4096!
You laptop has a fan, but it was probably spinning to cool down the GPU. This effect is 99.9% running on your graphics card; once everything is setup by the CPU, it's all running in shaders and video memory. Still hot, but just wanted to make clear where the power is being used.
It is a nice track! I wanted to do something with audio, stretching the cubes, changing their scale, and emitting different number of particles based on some audio analysis. The next experiment ^_^
About the frakenpolys: the hash info doesn't directly say the number of cubes to generate, but the side of the texture that hold the position. So if it is 256, it's a 256x256 RGBA Float32Array, 65536 particles that are then rendered as cubes. For odd numbers, or simply numbers that are not power of two, it doesn't work (well, it works, but the access to different vertices is all garbled and you get all those franken-noodle-cubes)
This is a Chrome DevTools extension I've been working on for a while. Its purpose is to enable a feature similar to Firefox DevTools Shader Editor, which shows the list of linked programs in a WebGL rendering context, and allows to live edit the source code of the vertex and fragment shaders.
It provides some nice features like syntax highlighting, error checking and autoformatting, thanks to CodeMirror.
It's finally reached a beta phase and it needs some testing. Any help or suggestions is welcome!
