Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | solcloud's commentslogin

That would be huge, also really good original scenario idea for a future sci-fi film


we have a bit of both here

thank you


ohh, date with Gaben incoming


that is exactly my meaning of open source but as you can see so many people disagree, but now I merged random license so it is 0K now I guess :)


I'm glad to see you're not bothered by these weird hn folk, I've said this before but people like to think hn is better than reddit when in reality we have our own brand of toxic here


You picked the best license, not a random one!


I hope so, but game will be now on categorized as pegi18 just because of license using strong language :D


I agree, but being good both at programming and art is quite unique skill, then there is also whole audio category, animations,...


The gaming world badly needs a central repository of art, only art (graphics, music, scenery, world maps, objects, ...) sort of a highly specialized Github. It should promote using well known file formats and structures to ease importing this or that object into a game project. And possibly allow the use of the torrent protocol to avoid clogging central servers as data files usually represent the heaviest load for a server.


Yeah yeah yeah, I am hurting open source, my apology to open source


[flagged]


You could have solved this issue. Your coding fingers turned into complaining fingers. If you really had a problem, you should have opened a PR with a license instead of demanding that OP do it on your timeline.


"Many hours later" is a great way to make it sound like a lot of time passed, but the creator said less than 24 hours ago they were open to adding a license and then several users accused him of essentially kicking puppies to death because it wasn't done yet.

He expressed anxiety and unfamiliarity with adding a license he didn't understand. Not to mention multiple users started arguing over the best license, further highlighting why he shouldn't just trust random internet comments and actually look into it. You're going to harass him for it? Do you own his time for the next week because he made a post on HN? Because that attitude is way more harmful to OSS than what you're up in arms about.

Furthermore, this is colloquially open-source to most people, and you're hung up on semantics. Anybody that needs to care about a license can look and see if one is there. If it's so simple to understand a license and add it to your project in such a short span of time, surely it's simple to check for the existence of one in the first place.


nicely written, thank you for kind words


chill, be nice


>Yeah yeah yeah, I am hurting open source, my apology to open source

Not a great response. Do you know where you are right now?


Maybe I am just waiting for somebody to open PR for adding license cause it looks like everybody is lawyer these days


Ah, well, if that's all: https://github.com/solcloud/Counter-Strike/pull/28

(It's kinda weird, because to make a PR, I had to make a fork, and then I added the licence to my fork, even though I'm not allowed to pick the licence, but )


It makes me want to start several PRs with conflicting licenses.


bring it :D now I thinks about suing anybody forking repo with licence change :D no seriously it is merged now so world is safe again :)


They went with a more open license. Try to do better next time with your license choices. GNU is not nearly as open as the "DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE."

https://github.com/solcloud/Counter-Strike/pull/27/files


Glad they did, because now my fork illegally adding a licence is legal again. Phew!


Just FWI, it's not illegal to add an incorrect license to a repository you don't have the rights to. It's simply a lie. The copyright notice is just a statement from the author, it doesn't per se define the terms under which the project is distributed. What defines them is the fact that it's the author who put the file there.


Heh, fair enough I suppose, though it's definitely not very nice to make people believe that I can give them permission to do things, when I don't.


this is awesome :D


What license do you want to share your work under? MIT? GPL? There's a couple of trade-offs in that choice.

Github has an overview of some of your options: https://github.com/readme/guides/open-source-licensing


Do they know who they dare talking to?! That tone, scandal!! Should know his/her place the unrespectful puny fella!


Yeah forget EA, this is football, thank you :)


If anybody is interested in in go for it, you can use server from repository and only code client side in godot than purchase bunch of cool assets and AAA game is born


thank you!


there is indeed a web version like others mentions, I also provided a prebuild binaries for lots of os/arch at https://solcloud.itch.io/counter-strike-football (and anybody can open PR for more), for hosted webpage demo I can for sure hosted somewhere on public internet as can anybody else, so I will leave that as a optional exercise for a reader to host community server :)

I think most users will build from source or use provided pre-build binaries


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: