EPUB has lots of nuances beyond the XHTML files. There's the structure of the folders, lots of XML files, how to name, link, and namespace things. It is not as straightforward and zipping a bunch of XHTML files.
As I understand it, X is avoiding to pay fines in Brazil, so in retaliation, Brazil ordered X to be blocked in Brazil if they don't respond. Starlink refused to follow along with the X block, so fines have been imposed at Starlink as well, for not following court order. I'm guessing the fines would accumulate daily, so now Starlink is adhering to the block.
Add in a bit of personality dramas, corruption and typical billionaire and politician bullshit and you have the full picture.
Why would you assume that I intentionally and delibrately lied | misrepresented this?
What I did do was quote EuroNews who reported (as was linked on HN yesterday) that:
Brazil's Supreme Court voted unanimously on Monday to uphold the decision by one of its justices to ban Elon Musk’s social media platform, X. [1]
You are correct that it was (as is common in many countries) a sub-panel of justices .. who all voted unanimously with no dissent opinions.
The panel that voted in a virtual session was comprised of five of the full bench's 11 justices, including de Moraes, who last Friday ordered the platform blocked for refusing to name a local legal representative, as required by law [2]
Regardless, the point made stands - describing the initial ban as the action of a single rogue justice no longer holds water.
So who appointed them means I get to ignore them? So I could start doing abortions in Florida up to birth tomorrow, because I don't agree about the decision of the Trump SCOTUS?
Appointed - has influence, it is too simple to pretend that you don't understand it. And no need for allegory - it is just an attempt to deceive your opponent.
thats the system, like in USA, the elected presidente chose the supreme court judges, and the judge in question was appointed by a right wing president in 2017 when current one is a left wing from a diferent party. so, yes, influence, but in this situation twitter is acting as a rogue company and refuses to comply with the law, it can fight in the court it they do not agree, but as in most countries, is not up to the criminal to decide what is legal and what is not, for that most countries have a due legal process, as is the case for everything that is happening
twitter is not complying with brazilian law, as stated in the constitution, and within brazilian legal framework, the supreme court has the legal atribution of defining what is legal or not, juditiary branch of government is separeted from executive and the judge in question was appointed by a right wing president in 2016 , current one is left wing, so everything acording to the law, telegram had this issue in 2020, they comply and now they can operate, as will twitter after comply with a simple court order, wich is required to have a legal representative in brazil, there is no question if it can or cannot operate, it can, just need to have someone to be responsable for the company and comply with the law
A. The law in Brazil says any company needs a legal representative in the country. X does not.
B. Under hate speech and misinformation laws some accounts were asked to be removed. They did not.
C. Because the company wasn’t replying at all to court requests, they consider that obstruction of justice vs trying to appeal the court
D. As far as Starlink they consider it a “de facto economic group under the control of Elon Musk” which is mostly true.
Now as far as the Constitution, this is the Supreme court. So saying X has the right to judge the Supreme Court to be in breach of the Constitution, when they themselves are meant to make those decisions, is pretty nutty to me. It's like saying I don't agree with the abortion ban in Texas/Florida so I will continue to do them, since I don't accept Roe V Wave was overturned by Dobbs, so I will just do my own thing, keep doing abortions and f the court.
That's a good way to get yourself arrested, which is what happened here.
Instead you should look into why do you think this to be the truth?
Considering your posts were so egregious even the mods took action against them, you actually showed everyone you are most likely a bot/sockpuppet/radical of some sort.
I wrote this post https://andregarzia.com/2021/01/lua-a-misunderstood-language... some time ago and it kinda touches similar points as the OP. Read on if any of yous want to see yet another person talking about Lua.
reply