Terraform supports this by setting prevent_destroy = true in a resource's lifecycle, which I discovered after I accidentally vanished an entire Elasticsearch domain—fortunately, though, not prod.
Every country they promised to, which is the core of the matter.
It's one thing to be upfront from the start about how you're going to independently produce vaccine for yourself first, ensuring nobody plans on receiving your production.
It's another entirely to promise to export and then later threaten to hold back.
The EU's local manufacturers were supplying non-locally because they had a contract to do that and the EU hadn't set up such a contract, or a contract at all. Usually, if you've not got a contract then you don't get a say, and usually, if other people set up a contract first, they get supplied first, which is why the EU tried to use other means, and because that jeopardises the most fundamental part of all trade - contracts - everyone condemned them. Quite rightly.
Neither Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna's vaccines bring any additional adjuvants to the yard. mRNA is inherently immunogenic. This speaks generally about mRNA vaccines and touches on that property, among others: https://www.cell.com/trends/molecular-medicine/fulltext/S147...
Yes, that's the idea: the price of sitting on a dragon's hoard of cash that's not doing anything is that its value decreases over time, so you are incentivized to actually do something with it.
Your economics are weird. Making a stupid analogy doesn't help it. There are no dragons, just individual people making decisions about how much to save and for what purpose, and when to spend it, based on their individual circumstances.
Holding on to savings is neither positive nor negative, and should be a personal decision based on individual's circumstances (that's where the most detailed information are available about what's good for the individual), not something forced/influenced from the top by blunt whole market manipulation via forced depreciation of value of money, by some committee.
All you've achieved by forced depreciation is forcing people to make needless risks, just to keep value of their savings, while they're trying to save up for something (like starting a business, or buying a flat, or safety of mind). Whole class of brokers, and traders, and lenders, who pray on this situation benefit, of course.
For what it's worth, I took up running, changed my diet, and found that both of those in combination did effectively nothing to address my ADHD symptoms. I'm a lot healthier now than I was before I discovered I loved running, but to this day I use medication because it's the only thing I've tried that makes a meaningful difference.
Running and diet improvements did great things for my ADHD, but it's not consistent. I'd fall into slumps due to ADHD-fuelled depression, I think. The stimulants do a great job warding that off and keeping me consistent with exercise. Consistent exercise tends to keep me consistent with diet.
If anyone argued that stimulants are bad for my health, I could only point out that without them, my health suffers acutely through sheer neglect and it's a downward spiral.
