Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | silveraxe93's commentslogin

While there's an extreme amount of hype around AI, it seems there's an equal amount of demand for signs that it's a bubble or it's slowing down.


Well, that’s only because it exhibits all the signs of a bubble. It’s not exactly a grand conspiracy.


2025 US defense budget is $849.8 billion[1].

Had a look and:

>In total, OpenAI aims to invest approximately $1.4 trillion in computing infrastructure – encompassing Google Cloud, Nvidia chips, and data center expansions.

Huh yeah fair. That's more than the yearly defense budget. Absurd. Though I'm sure it's not _yearly_

- [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_...


The sovereign wealth funds and billionaires need something to do with all their available cash. It's no fun just watching the number increase anymore, that got boring quite a while ago.


That is such an insane bet though! How many trillions can they have itching in their pockets


I read this[1] some time ago. Seems relevant now.

- [1] https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/why-does-ozempic-cure-all-d...


So they are biased because they said it was a toss-up and the election ended up being won by a razor's edge?

Votes wise, the electoral college makes small differences in popular votes have a larger effect in state votes.


Need to use a personal account. Check the first question in the FAQ: https://antigravity.google/docs/faq


This is a leak, yeah.

Though come on... Even with proofreading, this is an easy one to miss.


Why not? You can just install windows on it.


"Just", YMMV.

It has a custom motherboard for example, which may or may not be supported by Microsoft.


Windows works in SteamDeck, so I think it seems highly likely that Valve will provide the drivers for this device as well.


Tattoos are self-mutilation the same way that taxes are theft. This is the worst argument in the world [1]

-[1] https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/yCWPkLi8wJvewPbEp/the-noncen...


I was talking about scars. I wasn't the one who said tattoos are scars.


No it's not. It's literally a court order mandating them to collect this data.

- [1] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/08/openai-offers-20...


This article says nothing of the sort. The court order is to preserve existing logs they already have, not to disable logging, and hand all the logs over the plaintiffs. OpenAI's objections are mainly that 1/there are too many logs (so they're proposing a sample instead) and that 2/there's identifying data in the logs and so they are being "forced" to anonymize the logs at their expense (even though it's what they want as a condition of transferring the logs).

There is nothing in the article that mentions OpenAI being forced to create new logs they don't already have.


This response is misleading. Almost all computer services keep logs for a short period of time, so the court order to retain existing information is quite a bit more powerful than a layman would think. Because a huge amount of data is retained for a short period of time and then rapidly deleted in most web services I've worked on for the past 30 years.

This is true in services like Datadog, New Relic, and logging services like Splunk. But even privacy-focused services like Mullvad keep logs for 24 hours to monitor for abuse. So this concept that retaining logs is significantly weaker than not ordering the collection is really a bit of misdirection. I'm not sure whether it's intentional, but it's definitely misleading.


There is an important distinction that relates to a court’s ability to order a defendant to perform work to facilitate discovery. A court can order preservation of records, but they generally cannot order a defendant to create new ones. I was responding to your use of the word “collect,” which implies significantly more effort than merely not destroying logs (i.e. logging new information that they weren’t already).

It’s not misdirection or misleading; it lies in an understanding of the law. There’s plenty of case law out there on the subject if you’re interested.


Both are simply software changes. In one case, they're going to have to alter the software to not delete chats that users request to be deleted. In the other case, they'll alter the software to log new information. Neither of these are particularly difficult.


I understand, but the law still distinguishes between the two cases. In my experience, typically expunging is handled by a process separate from its creation (it depends on the logging framework, of course). And with the increasing trend of generated logs being ingested, processed, and stored by separate services, often disabling log deletion is a mere API call away.


Well, don’t get yourself sued and you won’t have to perform discovery for the plaintiffs.


[flagged]


If OpenAI truly didn't keep conversation records for any length of time, they would not be subject to this kind of order. Lots of stateless services get these and are able to defeat them because they never store the user's data. The fact that they store them at all means that they are in scope for a preservation order. It also means that they are in scope for all manner of usage by OpenAI themselves even if a user requests deletion.


It seems as if the court has forced OpenAI into collecting logs that they weren't otherwise collecting, or that they were deleting at user request.

So in this case not keeping logs as ordered by the court would be contempt of court.


Respectfully, it doesn’t matter the way it “seems,” it matters what is. They were collecting these logs, and as soon as they got the preservation order, they disabled deletion functionality and notified their customers of that.

There is a separate higher-tier private API customers can pay for that never had logging enabled, and the court did not force the company to add it.


This is an excellent article and source. Thank you.


I'm surprised Anthropic didn't release skills with a `skill-creation` skill.


But they did.


Did they!? Damn I missed it.

I was looking into creating one and skimmed the available ones and didn't see it.

EDIT:

Just looked again. In the docs they have this section: ``` Available Skills

Pre-built Agent Skills The following pre-built Agent Skills are available for immediate use:

    PowerPoint (pptx): Create presentations, edit slides, analyze presentation content
    Excel (xlsx): Create spreadsheets, analyze data, generate reports with charts
    Word (docx): Create documents, edit content, format text
    PDF (pdf): Generate formatted PDF documents and reports
These Skills are available on the Claude API and claude.ai. See the quickstart tutorial to start using them in the API. ```

Is there another list of available skills?


Their repo here: https://github.com/anthropics/skills

This is the skill creation one: https://github.com/anthropics/skills/blob/main/skill-creator...

You can turn on additional skills in the Claude UI from this page: https://claude.ai/settings/capabilities


Nice, thanks!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: