Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | signatoremo's comments login

Get your facts right. That’s Amazon, not Blue Origin. Amazon has booked flight with various launch providers, including SpaceX to meet their license’s requirement. It’s still a very aggressive schedule with little room for error.

It’s typical HN reaction to only paying attention to layoffs, but not hirings. Blue Origin grew substantially from 1000 in 2018 to 6000 in 2022, to 14,000 in 2024 [0]. Which isn’t much less than SpaceX, despite the latter handling 140 launches a year and handling thousands of Starlink satellites. Reducing the workforce only makes sense. Whether they’ve done it right is another story.

[0] - https://www.geekwire.com/2025/blue-origin-to-lay-off-10-of-w...


I am saying it is poor management, nothing more nothing less.

Hiring 8,000 people in two years then coming to the conclusion you "aren’t set up for the kind of success that we really wanted to have" is gross incompetence. Management isn't cleared out on the back of such a performance.


He is talking about cost. Are you saying price didn’t go down 10 times the last 12 months? How much data is too little?

1 year of data is indeed too little if you are trying to forecast one year ahead. Also the pricing is set by OpenAI. We don't know their actual costs decreased by that factor. Only that they cut their prices.

We don't know OpenAI's actual cost, but presumably Sam does know.

I'm sure he does, but why would he ever tell the truth about it except by coincidence?

The retail price, or the actual cost to deliver? Those are not the same thing. Cost to deliver could actually mean something. Retail pricing is approximately meaningless.

In context, retail pricing is very meaningful. The next sentence is "lower prices lead to much more use". That is, price elasticity of demand is large, and here price is retail price.

Cost and price are two different things. Sam said cost, but really he meant price, because even by his own admission, ChatGPT's services are running at a loss

https://twitter.com/sama/status/1876104315296968813?lang=en


I know this is subjective but he is comparing GPT-4 to 4o. The new model definitely felt lighter and faster, so probably cheaper for them to maintain, but at the same time very often gave worse answers than GPT-4.

Compute costs are pretty much the same for high vram cards?

How much do those tools cost? And if they are gonna use OpenAI's tools anyway, adding a similarly capable sales agent at a fractional cost would be a win.

It's the same story that has happened with phone camera. It's became capable enough, at much lower price, since everyone already has a phone, that standalone camera is a rare sight nowadays.


Huh, the paper cites World Bank, but WB themselves report differently:

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD

Any other official sources would tell you that US is the largest economy in the world by GDP, which is the most commonly accepted metric.


It’s an investment in the US. Why does it matter if SoftBank is not an American company?

Also, SoftBank is an investment fund. A lot of its money came from American investors.


This is not a government sponsored agreement. There is no locking out.

Trump probably wanted to start his presidency with a bang, being a person with excess vanity. The participating companies scored a PR coup.


Yes, everything that Trump does is bad.

Or then, consider that with his policies put forward the president brings investments to the US.


Weird question. Business deals are announced by politicians all the time, especially on overseas trips. Just an example:

https://boeing.mediaroom.com/2015-04-10-Presidents-Varela-Ob...


This isn't an overseas trip though. It's a private partnership announced by the sitting president in the Roosevelt room, literally across the hall from the oval office. I don't know how unprecedented that truly is, but it certainly feels unusual.


“The mission” isn’t the only meaningful drive.

It is hard to build a successful business out of even a most mundane ideas. That alone can be a great accomplishment that many people strive for. Also to be able to set and execute initiatives is also a great motivation. Seeing the fruits of your labor can be very rewarding.


> People who support Donald Trump are, in general, terrible people

This is not true, and that shows your narrow mindset. To give you the benefits of the doubt, can you explain why Trump supporters are not only wrong, but generally "terrible people"?


I have no desire to change anyone’s mind about their political views. Anyone who supports a known rapist and felon and who openly takes bribes can not be convinced of anything. I don’t engage in political discussions with such people. There is no consistency in their beliefs so no meaningful discusion can be had.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: