Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sideshowb's comments login

I like Bayes, but I thought the "surprising" result is that double descent is supposed to prevent nns from overfitting?

Good point. We wrote this pre-double descent, and a massively overparameterized model would make a nice addition to the tutorial as a baseline. However, if you want a rich predictive distribution, it might still make sense to use a Bayesian NN.

Analysis of recorded audio contains the phrase "for England, James?"


Finally a cogent post. Kids these days.


It's tempting to think the better strategy is to let the current Indian government block them and see how that plays out.


That would be true if WMF were running Wikipedia out of the goodness of their heart. They won’t leave India as they want to play a critical part in shaping public opinion among the largest group of people. Sadly people in India don’t agree with the political coverage of Wikipedia and other such media, which is what upsets almost all foreign NGOs, portals, companies in India. Some day it will become a case study as to how the whole internet (“civilized people”) in all countries was bending over backwards to be politically correct, while India was resisting the pressure to hand over their future to a “trusted group of altruists at the center of everything”.


I've since changed my opinion on what I said above. It sounds like they are complying in the short term to maintain their right to challenge this in the Indian courts, which actually seems like a good strategy.

I can't say I understand the rest of your comment, without more detail on which people (presumably not all 1.5 billion) are disagreeing with what coverage (presumably not all of it), etc.


Refer to this for more context: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41965925


This is a really good comment thread and got me thinking.

However here in the UK I'm not sure your point about virtual subsidy quite computes. Most of the free to use parking in valuable areas is street parking outside homes. Seeing as housing costs are just a big sponge that absorbs any surplus productivity, I suspect if people had to rent or buy those parking spaces to use them then you would see a corresponding drop in house prices/rents.


I don't think it's fair to consider Wal-Mart's parking free from a societal perspective. Presumably they pay for it and absorb the cost into your grocery bill.


I'm a bit baffled why Germany's numbers are so bad here. In the UK the government takes far more in revenue from drivers than it spends on the roads.


That's because the selection of numbers is a little bit weird. The 70 billion on the cost side are composed of 38 billion for construction and maintenance, 14 billion for traffic police and 18 billion for public funds spent for accidents. The generated income is only taxes on fuel and the tax car owners have to pay.

If you include the cost of the traffic police, there is way more stuff that you can include on the income side like taxes on car sales and part of the cost comes also back to the government in the form of taxes. There is likely also a large part of the costs that is missing. Doing this properly is a lot of work and doing it precisely is hard to impossible. These sort of things almost always include estimates for the higher order effects.

Btw: I googled the study[1] and apparently it was funded by the "Netzwerk Europäischer Eisenbahnen e.V." (Network of European Railways Association). I would take any statements and numbers with a huge grain of salt.

[1]: https://www.htw-berlin.de/forschung/online-forschungskatalog...


Maybe in UK local roads are funded differently? If you counted only national roads in Poland it would seem that Poland takes more in revenue than spends on roads, which isn't true if you count expenses on all the local roads that aren't in national budget.


No my op includes local roads though you're right you do have to gather the data from local authorities


Although the UK probably still makes cars, making and exporting cars is not as big a part of the UK economy as it is of the German economy.

Maybe that is why.


I'm all for this sort of experiment and wish them the best with it.

Just gonna leave this line here though:

> We’ve had to cap the number of reviewers on each article at seven, because that’s what our software can handle.

Maybe I can get an article published on 4 bit arithmetic? It'll be a significant breakthrough.


You seem to be suggesting that it's good writing style to make your reader struggle as if with a foreign language?


Ever read A Clockwork Orange? Guessing that didn't go over well with you.


Oh that was great. In no small part because Burgess's slang is rooted in real etymology so it's not entirely a foreign language so much as creative use of our own. Snowcrash is similar in this respect.


My original example was going to be, a young person reading an adult book with a large vocabulary. I decided that might come off as rude, so I changed it, and maybe lost some impact.

Put more bluntly: having a reading disability does not obligate all authors to write to your reading level.


>Put more bluntly: having a reading disability does not obligate all authors to write to your reading level.

This, although it's not even always a disability related issue. Sometimes things in life aren't made for you, and you'll be happier understanding that. It's similar to complaining that an advanced mathematics textbook wasn't understandable given your baseline understanding of maths. It's not being written for you.


I guess I don't interpret bmacho's comment as relating to disability, just a general objection to excessive weird words a la https://xkcd.com/483/


Given that diesels emit particulates and nox as well as co2, I'll note it's theoretically possible to tune them in a way that increases efficiency at the cost of other pollutants. I've no idea what the actual devices sold do, though.


> maleability

Intentional pun?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: