Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | shizcakes's comments login

No decision has been made in the NextNav case, and there’s a lot of significant opposition. What’s with the needless fearmongering?

Fear mongering? It’s not like this topic is going to cause a mass panic or anything.

I develop products for the 915 MHz band and became very anxious that I missed FCC's decision (none has been made yet). I agree with GP.

If you haven’t seen it, here’s a great and funny video from Map Men about the Longitude problem and Harrison’s timekeepers: https://youtu.be/3mHC-Pf8-dU?si=OK684LLRseJETrz_


Tell me you live in Cambridge, MA without telling me


“STREET CLEANING. NO PAHKING ON THE ODD NUMBAHED SIDE. YOU WILL BE TAGGED AND TOWED.”


It’s loud enough you hear earlier repetitions as a vague buzz in the distance, then crescendoing to a blare on your block, then receding with agonizing slowness like some hellish echo. And the whole time you thinking, awake now and very annoyed, “I don’t even own a car.”


And if you manage to get back to sleep, it soon jolts you awake again, and again.


I’m really confused. Solomon Hykes is typically credited as the creator of Docker. Who are you? Why is he credited if someone else created it?


> Why is he credited if someone else created it?

This is the internet and just about everyone could be diagnosed with Not Invented Here syndrome. First one to get recognition for creating something that's already been created is just a popular meme.


Solomon was the CEO of dotCloud. Sébastien the CTO. I (François-Xavier "bombela") was one of the first software engineer employee. Along with Andrea, Jérôme and Louis with Sam as our manager.

When it became clear that we had reached the limits of our existing buggy code, I pushed hard to get to work on the replacement. After what seemed an eternity pitching Solomon, I was finally allowed to work on it.

I wrote the design doc of Docker with the help of Andrea, Jérôme, Louis and Gabriel. I implemented the prototype in Python. To this day, three of us will still argue who really choose the name Docker. We are very good friends.

Not long after, I left the company. Because I was under paid, I could barely make ends meet at the time. I had to borrow money to see a doctor. I did not mind, it's the start-up life, am I right? I worked 80h/week happy. But then I realized not everybody was under paid. And other companies would pay me more for less work. When I asked, Solomon refused to pay me more, and after being denied three times, I quit. I never got any shares. I couldn't afford to buy the options anyways, and they had delayed the paperwork multiple times, such that I technically quit before the vesting started. I went to Google, were they showered me with cash in comparison. The next morning after my departure from dotCloud, Solomon raised everybody's salary. My friends took me to dinner to celebrate my sacrifice.

I am not privy to all the details after I left. But here is what I know. Andrea rewrote Docker in Go. It was made open source. Solomon even asked me to participate as an external contributor. For free of course. As a gesture to let me add my name to the commit history. Probably the biggest insult I ever received in life.

dotCloud was renamed Docker. The original dotCloud business was sold to a German company for the customers.

I believe Solomon saw the potential of Docker for all, and not merely an internal detail within a distributed system designed to orchestrate containers. My vision was extremely limited, and focused on reducing the suffering of my oncall duties.

A side story: the German company transfered to me the trademark of zerorpc, the open source network library powering dotCloud. I had done a lot of work on it. Solomon refused to hand me off the empty github/zerorpc group he was squatting. He offered to grant me access but retain control. I went for github/0rpc instead. I did not have time nor money to spend on a lawyer.

By this point you might think I have a vendetta against a specific individual. I can assure you that I tried hard to paint things fairly with a flattering light.


He means he came up with the same concept, not literally created Docker.


The essay ends

> But we can pay it forward: we can keep progress going, and build an even better world for the generations to come.


It’s the cookie consent form being discussed.


Exactly, it's about the cookie consent. I was a bit shocked when I saw that, and thought it's interesting, so submitted it.

I expected 10-50 "partners" but definitely not 800+.

I guess that is why most websites just list their "partners" and hope nobody will actually count them.


I don’t see a single such submission in their pull requests, open or closed, in the past couple weeks.


Read that comment more closely: they didn't ask for PRs to one of their own repos, they asked for a brand new repo to be created, and a link to that repo to be emailed to them.


I picked up electronics a bit this summer, got my amateur radio license & upgrade, and I find The Art Of Electronics to be astonishingly good.


That one's a classic. Have it right next to me.


What's eye opening here?

These are basically all tech support providers. I'm not saying Google is a privacy-centric company, but this effort to enumerate subprocessors is admirable.

The internet becomes a worse place when folks criticize the superficial number rather than the intent.


The sheer number of processors. I agree and appreciate this level of detail, but do you know this for all the companies that have access to your data? I don't, so I found this enlightening.


Where else do you think TVCs come from? Keep in mind that although these are subprocessors, the Accenture, et al employees handling Google user data are red-badged and employed under Google contract terms, which explicitly dictate controls around allowed and disallowed systems and user data access.

TBH, it's not that it would be impossible for either Google or a subprocessor to conduct themselves nefariously, but I don't think it's practical or reasonable for anyone to expect that they would. Google pays Accenture, for example, >$1b/yr for services. They absolutely would not want to put that cash cow at risk.


I went to a 1234567890 "gathering" in a hotel lobby in Boston in 2009


I was doing the late shift on a trading floor at a big bank.

The head of the derivatives tech support team pointed out it was about to hit so we opened up a shell and did a "watch" command + outputting the "date" command in epoch seconds and watched it happen.

Then we went back to working.


I remember that moment! I was out at a bar or something at the time but I was prepared and had my laptop with me haha. I was mashing the up arrow and enter to make sure I didn’t miss it.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: