Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | senexex's commentslogin

The level of group think here is unbelievable. Any opinion other than this is down voted immediately. A whole page of people bargaining and not wanting to face reality.

At my work, our healthcare plan renewed May 1st. We have great insurance. The CEO told us that the healthcare premiums just went up 50% so enjoy this year because it is going to be less great next year.

It doesn't matter how many people have a type of religious faith that this has nothing to do with AI and is all posturing.

The reality is AI is going to get cheaper in the future and I am just going to keep getting more expensive as an employee as we circle the drain in this health care and debt death spiral that everyone is also in complete denial of with no political will to do anything about.

S&P 500 is at an all time high. The real layoffs haven't even started yet.


Yeah, I just don't understand the thinking here on HN anymore. (My account is 15 years old)

It was clear to me even before ChatGPT arrived that software was eventually going to go the same way agriculture went. We will simply need fewer people to do the job than before.

I don't buy that AI will completely automate away all software engineering. I think if you're not in the top ~40% skill wise, you're in serious trouble and have a bleak future.


I think we're probably past peak employment for software engineers, but I'd also be surprised if these layoffs were directly related to Cloudflare thinking they can replace their engineering teams with AI agents.

Eh... Are you claiming the dollar inflation is caused by AI?

Or rather, are you claiming it's caused by productivity gains from AI?


The problem is we can't see the counter factual of what hiring looks like without LLMs on some alternative timeline.

It is perfectly plausible that hiring would be much more without LLMs so that data is not proof of what the article pretends it to be.


An additional problem is that it looks like the colors are from the intersection of 3 random paintings. The masters already picked their colors on one painting. If you randomly average them it is like a kid mixing finger paints. You aren't going to get a better color scheme from 3 random masterworks.

Actually I group artworks based on artist/ganre/style similar color palette and showcase up to 3 images from that group.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: