Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | scriptr's commentslogin

https://github.com/litestar-org/litestar-fullstack is also nice on figuring out how to scale Litestar to a "common" app pattern that is medium+ size

What would you like to see here? Could you perhaps open an issue at https://github.com/litestar-org/litestar so we can track and implement this?

If you are just needing a client what you need should be available OOTB, unless you want more hands off.

Here is also a good article for example: https://dev.to/pbaletkeman/secure-python-litestar-site-with-...


I need to think a bit more about what I want exactly. In short, I'm trying to manage auth through Keycloak but I also need a way to manage user sessions so there needs to be a way to store tokens generated by Keycloak in a DB in the backend and properly sync token invalidation/refresh with Keycloak.


That's an interesting take! As one of the maintainers, I like the featureset we have and use it in multiple production apps at work, but think that our documentation is one sore spot compared to e.g., Django and FastAPI. Not to say it isn't good, but I think FastAPI and Django's docs are pretty great.


Here is a real world use case review from a company that has products serving the NCAA/NFL

https://www.reddit.com/r/starlite/comments/10xo6ra/user_show...


Threadpools incur high overhead but that should work mostly.

Also, in Litestar Sync is a first class citizen just as much as async is.

You can see in benchmarks (that shouldnt be taken as gospel) how frameworks drop off in sync perf., where Litestar maintains both well.

https://docs.litestar.dev/latest/benchmarks.html


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: