Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | scaglio's comments login

Fascinating! The wine discovery reminds me one scene from the book 'The Dark Forest'[0] when the protagonist drinks a wine from some centuries before... spoiler: it wasn't good.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Forest


A couple of years ago I wrote a brief article about Halloween, and linked to the Roman Lemuria: https://godsip.club/articles/monster-mash/


> You could also say: Five megameters!

I love this expression!


This is another great (and interactive) source on the subject: https://www.learndmarc.com/


*The Three-Body Problem intensifies*


Oh give me a locus, where the gravitons focus, and the three-body problem is solved… [1]

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRns6u5bHuw


That's the point, but often in many network issues, the name resolution is the root cause of the problem. Not necessarily the DNS itself. Sometimes the /etc/hosts is more than enough to cause headaches!


I've certainly added a hostname to an /etc/hosts file for testing and forgotten.

Nothing makes sense, where is this address coming from? Oh. It was me. I put it there.


YES! IBM's Fix Central, or how it's called, it's literally a maze.

And I hate Oracle's and Red Hat's paywalls, even if I can understand their presence.


Interesting! Surely there are lots of moors…


Moorhamshirecockbottom, being one.


I'm disappointed: I can't see any comments about the awful .zip file integration in modern Windows version. Extracting the files requires a pop-up or a non-intuitive context menu.


Last time I tried to use the built-in zip extraction was in XP, perhaps Win7. It was awful.

It was slow. Unzipping archived source with thousands of files could take an hour or more... or 15 seconds via pkunzip.

It didn't warn of corruption. Windows-unzip a corrupted file, and it will just stop at the point of corruption with no feedback, as though complete. Using pkunzip you'd get a warning about a corrupted file.

Being that slow, and not reporting errors are two things that really aren't acceptable. I have no idea if it's improved since then.


It sounds like it was the best it could reasonably be expected be back in the late 90s, and if it hasn't been improved sufficiently since then is probably not at all his fault.


Yes, absolutely, I didn't mean to blame him. But from Windows 95 to 11 something could have been improved, from MS.


Yes, exactly. SMS should be an option because it is obsolete, and therefore unsecure.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: