I think it was Cloudflare but you might be right that it was Google - either way, I'm just using default DNS from my ISP, and only had issues for the past few weeks (and only with that one domain, .is not the others - while iirc the known problem with one major DNS provider was due to some choice of DNS setting that means all archive.today domains are affected not just one/some.)
No matter which upstream DNS you use, if you have a local resolver, you might be able to configure it to resolve archive domains with google's dns, which has consistently worked for me for years.
If you use dnsmasq (either bundled inside pihole or not), this line in its config will make it use google dns to resolve archive.is and archive.ph:
server=/archive.is/archive.ph/8.8.8.8
I started using blocky instead of pihole recently, and I have this in my blocky config.yaml to do the same thing:
i still fall asleep to the selected ambient works. aphex twin was truly ahead of his time. If you want another awesome ambient album, i highly suggest BT's If the Starts Are Eternal, So Are You and I for awesome ambience.
LOL. Imagine having multiple whistleblowers telling you about widespread criminal negligence at Boeing manufacturing facilities, then all you say is "Ok, now let's see some data". The fucking clowns on this site. LOL.
No it's not a strawman argument. You are missing the point. The article is about a whistleblower reporting criminal negligence at Boeing. It is not a statistical report. Statistics are irrelevant here. However if you want some recent Boeing stats then look at the 737 Max. Two complete losses within two years of its introduction. You must have been living in a cave to not hear about that.
From the article.
"In a virtual meeting with reporters, Salehpour said Boeing was so eager to meet its production goals that it took "shortcuts" when it fastened together the carbon-composite fuselage of the 787. That could dramatically shorten the life of the plane, he warned, potentially causing it to break apart in mid-flight."
Many cloud providers maintain the pretence that their employees don't have access to customer data.
For example, they like to maintain that if you run an amazon competitor hosted on AWS, amazon insiders can't look at sales numbers in your hosted database. Or if you run a google competitor with e-mail hosted on gmail, that google insiders can't view your e-mails. And so on.
Personally I've always found these promises rather hard to believe, but a lot of people have a great deal of trust in them.
I worked for a large cloud provider and that is correct, employees did not have access to customer data. The encryption key in this product is split between a SQL database and the front end servers with blob data being stored outside of SQL (customer data). There was no way for a single employee to get access to both portions of the key to decrypt customer data.
Using AWS when you're a competitor of Amazon seems like poor business decision making.
I have zero doubts this is going to surpass 50M views within 24h. Going for the record would be a stretch, but it'd still rank 14th in the list of videos with most views in the first 24 hours.
