Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | s0teri0s's comments login

Does this work at all on those demonstration videos where the videographer is too shy to add a vocal track, and just demonstrates everything, sometimes with text?


There should be some kind of legal document an artist can choose to complete, a "Do Not Reanimate Me" choice. If they decline to make a decision, or agree to be simulated, fine. If they they make their wishes known, that should be respected by their estate.


Why? Because you don't like it?

It's all perverted now, but the intent of copyright was to encourage artists to create new works for the benefit of society. It wasn't because there's some inalienable right to protect their ideas - it was a trade: "limited monopoly" for "new creation".

What benefit are the rest of us in society getting in exchange for this rule you want to impose upon us?


Even that might not be enough.

There was a case recently where an author wrote in their will, "Do not release this unfinished material".

The estate released it anyway.


Dead people generally don't have rights.


That’s false. They write wills that we respect, and we don’t make kebabs out of their bodies. But it’s the kind of respect that is not trendy anymore…


Yes, we have a legal process for inheritance.

What I meant was beyond that. You can't slander a dead person, for example. However it appears that this may not be as clear-cut as I had thought, for example if there is an Estate that is continuing to earn income from the assets of the deceased person, then there may be a basis for the Estate to sue for damages if a slander or libel reduces those earnings.

So, I (somewhat) stand corrected. At least in the case of someone like Tupac.


Most societies learned to respect their dead. We may be at a turning point.


Really it should be opt-in. All currently dead artists should be off limits by default.


The question would be who this rule is for.

It's not for the artists, they're dead. It's not for the right holders, as they're already in control of what happens with the likelihood of the deceased artist. If it's for the family, they should be set as right holders from the start if it mattered to the artist.

Is it for the public then ? Should the public have a say on how the right holder monetize their assets ?

I see an argument from preventing art pieces from disappearing at the will of the right holder, but preventing creation of new art should not be a public decision IMHO.


How does that notion mesh with existing precedent on the public domain regarding intellectual property?


It is a progression:

year 1 = 100% of your life year 2 = 50% of your life year 3 = 33% of your life ... year 10 = 10% of your life ... year 50 = 2% of your life

etc.


Lol, this was EXACTLY my high school sr. year social studies project in 1980, with roughly the same effort (sadly, I didn't create a working clock). I won first place, with just this. The only difference is I named the metric units 'mints.'


It's not super hard to create a clock, you just have to find a 24-hours clock then you create custom labels/board for it.

Or if your system works with 2 rotations per day use a regular clock.


Also, no mention of the need for only 10 big-ass time zones instead of 24 relatively narrow time zones. The continental US might have only 2 time zones instead of 4.


Why is having fewer time zones a good thing?

Wouldn't this actually be confusing, because things would have to be happening at different local times depending on where you are in the time zone?


I wasn't really advocating for it, I just think if we were crazy enough to adopt this time system, 10 time zones would also be a necessary adjustment.


Ah, I see. That makes sense! Although not all timezones are +/- an integer number of hours.


This is already the case, timezones have weird shapes and some of them are huge.

In Europe and China you have timezones spanning over 3 "sun" timezones. In practice that means the sun rising and setting at different times. People are used to have the sun setting late or rising early depending where they live.


Nothing says that time zones have to align on even hours. They don't today - look at India for example.


In before someone made a "my O face" joke.


This is nice. If possible, I would change it so that a left rotation happened on a left click and a right rotation happened on a right click; make scoring optional if you want it to be more relaxing.


I don't get the TickTock.


And that's okay, you're allowed to not care or have an opinion on things.


It’s another leap in TV. What’s not to get?


The two best things I did for my mental health was leave Facebook (years ago) and stop watching the news. Hacker News is my news source (along with Ars Technica), I don't look at anything more political or world-eventy than these two sources, and I am selective about links even here. I can't even stomach NPR anymore.

More recently on the mental health front, I've been drawing more. I'm not great at it, but it is relaxing and distracting.

Also ambient or jazz--opinion-free, story-free music.

So I am still feeling burnt out, but it is a slower burn.


I opened expecting a picture of a pip-boy-like device a-la Fallout.


To be fair, if you click other comment's image link, it still looks like it belongs in the universe (or maybe that's just from oxidation over time!)


The same reason television isn't more fun and weird.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: